How Can Opposite Deflections in a Magnetic Field Be Explained?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of two charged particles moving in a magnetic field, where they are deflected in opposite directions. The correct scenario explaining this phenomenon is that both particles were initially moving in the same direction but are oppositely charged. Confusion arises regarding the interpretation of "opposite directions," as it can refer to the sign of the velocity cross magnetic field (vxB) or their spatial movement. The participants debate the implications of these definitions on the validity of the proposed scenarios. Ultimately, clarity on the terminology is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
sona1177
Messages
171
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a magnetic field in the z direction. Two particles are moving perpendicular to this magnetic field, that is, they are both moving in the x-y plane. It is observed that the particles are both deflected by the magnetic field and they are deflected in opposite directions. Which of the following scenarios can account for this behavior?
they were initially moving in the same direction, but one is uncharged False
they were initially moving in the same direction, but they are oppositely charged TRUE
they were initially moving in opposite directions, but they have the same charge False
they were initially moving in the same direction, but they have the same charge False
they were initially moving in opposite directions, but both are uncharged False
they were initially moving in opposite directions, but they are oppositely charged False

Homework Equations



what am i doing wrong? someone please, help its due in 20 mins!

The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you been supplied with a meaning to "opposite directions"?
 
I fail the person who made up this question. So forfeit goes to the student.

If "opposite direction" means vxB is oppositely signed for the two particles, #2 is correct.
If "opposite direction" refers to a spatial direction, #3 is the correct answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top