How Can Optimal Bounds for Sum of Reciprocals Between Two Numbers Be Determined?

hudson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
given any two numbers a,b and an upper and lower bound for the sum of reciprocals of a certain class of integers between a and b, without any direct calculation how can optimal upper and lower bounds for the number of terms in the sum be found
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how one could do this without 'any direct calculation'. However, one can find the integral of the characteristic function * (1/x) over [a,b] to estimate the sum.
 
What does optimal mean?
 
I have to assume that when you say "a certain class of integers" you mean a congruence class, something like the integers in an arithmetic progression a+n b. In that case this is not difficult. Given two numbers A,B, B>A, the number of integers in an arithmetic progression a+n b that are equal to or between two Numbers A, B , and therefore the number of terms in the required sum is [(B-a)/b]-[(A-a)/b] where [] denotes the integer part of the quantity in the brackets. A more interesting question is: given the integers A, B and an arithmetic progression (a,b) to come up with upper and lower bounds for the sum of the reciprocals of the terms in the arithmetic progression that are between or equal to A,B.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top