How Can Photons Have Momentum If They Have No Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 3dsmax
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Mass
3dsmax
Wikipedia says that photons have momentum. How can that be possible since p=mv?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3dsmax said:
Wikipedia says that photons have momentum. How can that be possible since p=mv?


The Poynting vector,S, gives momentum of light, and is given by:

S = E X B...E= electric field
B= magnetic field
X is cross product

However, this is the classical answer...and maybe this answer should be in classical section.:smile:
 
Last edited:
3dsmax said:
Wikipedia says that photons have momentum. How can that be possible since p=mv?

According to relativity, the spatial momentum of a "particle" that has rest mass m is

p = \frac{mv}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.

To consider a photon, let m \rightarrow 0 and v \rightarrow c. This gives zero over zero, which is indeterminant, and can be anything (including non-zero values), depending on how the limits are taken.

Also, relaltivity says that for any particle,

E^2 - (cp)^2 = \left(mc^2\right)^2.

Even if m=0, p is non-zero when E is non-zero. In fact,

E = cp

for a photon.
 
i wish that i was in a higher physics class so that i could understand you.
 
3dsmax said:
Wikipedia says that photons have momentum. How can that be possible since p=mv?
The inertial mass M (aka relativistic mass) of a photon is defined just like the mass of all particles, as M/i] = p/v = p/c where p is the magnitude of the momentom and v is the particle's speed. I believe that you're thinking about a photon's proper mass m, which is zero for all photons.

The definition of the mass of a particle allows the following relation to be derived (let m = proper mass)

p = sqrt[1-(v/c)sup2]/c

This can be solved for m which in turn will be a function of the energy and momentum and when E = pc me will always turn out to be 0.

Pete
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top