How can the distance to nearby stars be calculated using the parallax method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The parallax method calculates the distance to nearby stars using the formula d=1/(theta), where d is the distance in parsecs and theta is the parallax angle in arcseconds. Theta is indeed the parallax, determined by observing the star from two points in Earth's orbit, typically in January and June. The angular distance between these observations gives the value of theta. Alternatively, right ascension and declination can be used to compute the separation through spherical trigonometry. This method effectively allows astronomers to measure stellar distances accurately.
MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Just a little question, using the formula d=1/(theta), d is the distance in pc and theta is the angle in arsecs. Is theta simply the parallax? or if not, can it be calculated from right ascention and declination?

Thanks, Matt.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Originally posted by MathematicalPhysics
Just a little question, using the formula d=1/(theta), d is the distance in pc and theta is the angle in arsecs. Is theta simply the parallax? or if not, can it be calculated from right ascention and declination?

Thanks, Matt.

You have to observe the star from two ends of the Earth's orbit, in January and in June (aphelion and perihelion, the two ends of the semimajor axis of the orbital ellipse). Then you compute the angular distance between the two observations; that's your theta. You could do the computation by recording your two observations as right ascension and declination and then doing spherical trig to calculate the separation.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top