How can the given differential equation be solved using power series?

AI Thread Summary
The differential equation y'' - xy' - y = 0 can be solved using a power series centered at x0 = 1, leading to a recurrence relation of (n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} - a_{n+1} - a_n = 0. The challenge arises because the terms a_2 and a_3 are expressed in terms of both a0 and a1, complicating the identification of linearly independent solutions. To resolve this, two independent solutions can be obtained by setting a0 = 1 and a1 = 0 for one solution, and a0 = 0 and a1 = 1 for the other. This approach allows for the separation of terms while still satisfying the recurrence relation. Thus, the power series method effectively yields the required solutions despite the initial complexity.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
I'm having some difficulty with this question:

Solve the given differential equation by means of a power series about the given point x0. Find the recurrence relation. Also find the first four terms in each of two lin. indep. solutions. If possible, find the general term in each solution:

y'' - xy' - y = 0 , \ \ x_0 = 1

First of all, like in all the preceding problems, I noted that the coefficient of the y'' term, P(x), was equal to 1, so every point, including x0, is an ordinary point. I therefore assumed that the power series was of the form:

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{a_n(x - x_0)^n}

and converged over some interval |x - x_0| < \rho, which I guess I would normally confirm later, if the question actually required it. So after differentiating the power series representation of y to give me y' and y'', and doing some appropriate manipulations, I was able to express the DE as follows:

2a_2 - a_1 - a_0 \ \ + \ \ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2}(x - 1)^n} \ \ - \ \ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{(n+1)a_{n+1}(x - 1)^n} \ \ - \ \ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{na_{n}(x - 1)^n} \ \ - \ \ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{a_{n}(x - 1)^n} = 0

This gave the recurrence relation:

(n+2)(n+1)a_{n+2} - a_{n+1} - a_n = 0

This recurrence relation is correct (I checked the answers). But the problem I'm having is that each term is expressed in terms of both a1 and a0:

a_2 = \frac{a_1 + a_0}{2}

a_3 = \frac{3a_1 + a_0}{6}

Normally, the even terms are expressed in terms of a0, and the odd terms in terms of a1. So, both sets of terms satisfy the recurrence relation, and you can split them up to obtain two lin. indept. solutions with arbitrary constants a0 and a1. However, in this case, you get (x-1)^3 (ie odd terms, for example) with coefficients that include both a1 and a0. What they seem to have done in the answers is split up the (x-1)^n term into two parts, one with a0 and the other with a1. So for example, one solution would get the (a1 / 2) *(x-1)^3 term, and the other solution would get the (a0 / 6) *(x-1)^3 term. But neither of these terms sastifies the recurrence relation on its own, only when they are together! So if you split them up and put them in two separate series, then neither series is a soln' to the DE! How DO you get two linearly independent solutions from this recurrence relation?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a little bump, as this thread seems to have gotten lost in the woodwork. I know it's long and convoluted, but the question is fairly straightforward.
 
cepheid said:
Just a little bump, as this thread seems to have gotten lost in the woodwork. I know it's long and convoluted, but the question is fairly straightforward.

You have two linearly independent solutions by taking {a0=1 and a1=0} and
{a0=0 and a1=1}, for example.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top