How can the limits of this integral be changed to make it easier to solve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral \(\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}\), which appears in "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David Griffiths. Participants are exploring the implications of changing the limits of integration and the effects of a substitution suggested by Karl Weierstrass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the substitution \(t=\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})\) and its impact on the limits of integration, noting that it results in the same limits for both the lower and upper bounds. Some question the validity of this substitution due to continuity issues at \(\phi = \pi\). Others suggest breaking the integral into two parts and using properties of cosine to analyze the situation further.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions behind the substitution. There is recognition of the continuity issue, and some participants are exploring alternative approaches to handle the integral effectively.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the substitution function must be continuously differentiable over the interval [0, 2π], which raises concerns about its applicability at \(\phi = \pi\). The original integral's limits and the implications of symmetry in the cosine function are also under consideration.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I was trying to solve this problem. The integral is

[tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[/tex]

Now I came across the integral while doing one of the problems in "Introduction to
Electrodynamics" By David Griffiths (3ed) . The substitution of course, as suggested by
Karl Weierstrass, is

[tex]t=\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})[/tex]

But the new limits of the integral are same at lower and upper point. I checked the solution
manual of the book and the author says that

[tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}=2\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[/tex]

I couldn't understand this step. Any insight will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wouldn't [itex]\cos(\pi-x)=-\cos(x)[/itex] ?

But looking at my original integral limits, or seeing that the substitution gives the same upper and lower limit, how would I think in your direction. I mean , when I see that the substitution gives same limits, I feel like stuck there. How do I analyze the situation mathematically ?
 
IssacNewton said:
Hi

I was trying to solve this problem. The integral is

[tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[/tex]

Now I came across the integral while doing one of the problems in "Introduction to
Electrodynamics" By David Griffiths (3ed) . The substitution of course, as suggested by
Karl Weierstrass, is

[tex]t=\tan(\frac{\phi}{2})[/tex]

But the new limits of the integral are same at lower and upper point.

This is because the substitution is not allowed in this case. You'll need the substitution function, that is [tex]\tan(\phi/2)[/tex] to be continuously differentiable on [tex][0,2\pi][/tex]. But it isn't continuous in pi. This is not a problem with indefinite integrals however...

I checked the solution
manual of the book and the author says that

[tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}=2\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[/tex]

I couldn't understand this step. Any insight will be appreciated.

Do

[tex]\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[tex]=\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}+\int_{\pi}^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi}{1+a \cos \phi}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now, in the last integral, do the substituation [tex]t=2\pi-\phi[/tex]...[/tex]
 
IssacNewton said:
wouldn't [itex]\cos(\pi-x)=-\cos(x)[/itex] ?

But looking at my original integral limits, or seeing that the substitution gives the same upper and lower limit, how would I think in your direction. I mean , when I see that the substitution gives same limits, I feel like stuck there. How do I analyze the situation mathematically ?

Yeah, I spoke a little too fast. Try cos(2pi-x)=cos(x). Take the integral over [pi,2pi] and substitute 2pi-u=theta.
 
micromass, I TOTALLY forgot about the continuity. Doing too much physics does that
to the person...lol

Dick, thanks for the input.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K