How can the product rule be applied to a function with 3 variables?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the product rule to a function involving three variables in the context of implicit differentiation. Participants clarify that the product rule can be extended to three variables by differentiating one variable at a time while multiplying by the other variables and summing the results. The original equation presented, 2y'yx + 6x = 0, is analyzed, leading to the conclusion that it can be simplified to find y' in terms of x and y. It is noted that the equation can be rearranged to isolate y', demonstrating the relationship between the variables. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the application of differentiation rules in multivariable contexts.
bumclouds
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
hey there,

At the moment at school I'm doing Implicit Differentiation.

If i had for Instence 2y'yx + 6x = 0

how can I use the product rule on the first step when there are 3 variables?

Cheers-
Andy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simple, you can derive it yourself using the rule for 2 variables :

\frac{d}{dx}(uvw) = uv\frac{dw}{dx} + w\frac{d}{dx}(uv) = uv\frac{dw}{dx} + w(u\frac{dv}{dx} + v\frac{du}{dx}) = uv\frac{dw}{dx} + vw\frac{du}{dx} + uw\frac{dv}{dx}

Doesn't the form look simple ? Differentiate one variable at a time, multiply by all other variables, then take it through all the combinations, and add everything up. Of course, it applies for any number of variables.

Can you do your problem now ? (But to tell you the truth, the problem you gave is unclear - if you're trying to find out y' in terms of y and x, all you need to do is rearrange the terms).
 
Last edited:
Thankyou very much. Yes, I was trying to find y' in terms of the other stuff. Previously, I had only learned the product rule for two variables.. like u'.v + u.v'.
 
bumclouds said:
If I had for instance 2y'yx + 6x = 0

how can I use the product rule on the first step when there are 3 variables?
Well, unless something is mis-typed, there are two variables if one assumes y = y(x) and y' = dy(x)/dy, and y would be dependent on x which is an independent variable.

In the above equation, "2x" factors out leaving y'y + 3 = 0, or y' = dy/dx = -3/y, or y dy = -3 dx.

Curious3141 provided the correct chain rule for 3 dependent variables, the fourth x being independent.
 
That would be three dependent variables.
 
It would have been better to say "3 factors".

(uvw)'= u'vw+ uv'w+ uvw'.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K