How Can Two Equations Have Multiple Points of Intersection?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equations y=x^2-x and y=x, highlighting the process of finding their points of intersection. The user correctly identifies one intersection point at (0,0) by setting x^2-x equal to x, leading to x=0. However, confusion arises as the answer book lists an additional intersection point at (2,2). The user seeks clarification on how two equations can have multiple points of intersection, indicating a misunderstanding of the solution process. Ultimately, the conversation reflects a common challenge in solving quadratic equations and interpreting their graphical intersections.
bob4000
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i have y=x^2-x and y=x

from this x^2-x=x
therefore: x^2=0, and x then equals zero.

putting this info into y=x, y=0

this gives the points (0,0). however, in the answer book, it shows that the points of intersection are (0,0) and (2,2). how is it possible to do this?!

appreciate any help or guidance

thanx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dont worry about it just got confused

thnx
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top