How Can U-238 Cross Section Be Accurately Modeled in the Resonance Region?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective absorption cross section of U-238 in the resonance region between 1 eV and 10 keV, highlighting the complexity due to numerous resonances. The original poster seeks methods to accurately model the U-238 cross section as a function of energy, expressing frustration with MS Excel's fitting capabilities. Participants mention resonance escape probabilities for light water reactors and reference a detailed paper by E. Hellstrand from 1957 that addresses the complexities of this region. A link to a comprehensive resource on U-238 cross sections is also provided. Accurate modeling of U-238 in this energy range remains a challenging task.
Nucengable
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hello , I was trying to calculate the effective absorption cross section ( group constant) of U-238 in the resonance region between neutron energies (1 ev - 10 kev) but as you can see from the picture U-238 has a lot of resonance at this region, I was wondering if there is a way I can obtain U-238 cross section as function of energy in this region, I was trying to fit the tabulated data of the energy vs cross section (barn) using MS EXCEL but it was incapable to give me an accurate fit. any help would great...

[url=http://www.0zz0.com][PLAIN]http://www3.0zz0.com/2012/05/04/19/327609909.png[/url][/PLAIN]


Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Resonance escape probabilities for typical light water reactors are 0.90 or so;
http://t2.lanl.gov/data/n7-pdf/u/238.pdf shows how complex this region is for U238, and It seems a detailed paper was done by E Hellstrand in 1957
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5121844&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5121844
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Back
Top