How Can We Calculate Displacement and Average Velocity for a Complex Trip?

  • Thread starter Thread starter negation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Earth
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating displacement and average velocity for a car's complex trip involving three segments: driving north, then east, and finally southwest. The x and y components of the displacements were calculated, resulting in a total x-displacement of 2.88 miles and a y-displacement of 4.58 miles. There was some confusion regarding the interpretation of displacement versus total distance traveled, as well as a humorous aside about an unrelated asteroid reference in the title. The participants confirmed the calculations but noted that the final answer should include total distance and direction. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in physics problems and calculations.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car drives north at 40mi/h for 10mins then turns east and goes 5min at 60mi/hr. Finally it goes southwest at 30mi/h for 6min.
a) determine the displacement
b)average velocity for this trip




The Attempt at a Solution



x-component: 60mi/hr/60min x 5min = 5mi
y-component: 40mi/h/60min x 10mins = 6.7mi

south-west:
x-component:[(-30mi/hr cos 45°)/60mins]6min = -2.12mi
y-component: [(-30mi/hr sin 45°)/60mins]6min = -2.12mi

a) x-displacement: 5mi + (-2.12mi) = 2.88mi i
y-displacement: 6.7mi + (-2.12mi) = 4.58mi j
b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi negation! :smile:
negation said:
x-component: 60mi/hr/60min x 5min = 5mi
y-component: 40mi/h/60min x 10mins = 6.7mi

south-west:
x-component:[(-30mi/hr cos 45°)/60mins]6min = -2.12mi
y-component: [(-30mi/hr sin 45°)/60mins]6min = -2.12mi

a) x-displacement: 5mi + (-2.12mi) = 2.88mi i
y-displacement: 6.7mi + (-2.12mi) = 4.58mi j

yes, that looks fine, except i think they expect you to finish by converting into a total distance and a direction :wink:

(by "direction" i don't know whether they want an angle, or whether specifying a unit vector would be enough)

(i assume you're ok on b)?)

EDIT: just noticed …

how does this save Earth from an asteroid?? :confused:
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but displacement means the distance between the starting point and the destination, therefore not the total ground covered.

Yeah, what does the asteroid have to do with it? :O
 
lendav_rott said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but displacement means the distance between the starting point and the destination, therefore not the total ground covered.

Yeah, what does the asteroid have to do with it? :O


Sorry it was a careless blunder as to the title.
Question has been solved
 
careless blunder?!

it won't always be a practice! :rolleyes:

whole planets have been lost for less! :frown:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top