How can we find out from the Lagrangian if energy is conserved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter czdatka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
Decomposing the Lagrangian into kinetic and potential energy is not always straightforward, as not all Lagrangians can be expressed in this way. To determine if energy is conserved, the condition that the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to time is zero (∂L/∂t = 0) is necessary, but not sufficient on its own. The conservation of energy can be derived from the Euler-Lagrange equations, leading to a conserved quantity that is often the energy, provided certain conditions are met. Specifically, energy is conserved if the potential is independent of velocity and the transformation to generalized coordinates is time-independent. The discussion also highlights the complexity of relating the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian and the context of the specific Lagrangian used.
czdatka
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I actually have 2 questions.

1)How do you decompose the Lagrangian into kinetic and potential energy?

2)Knowing the Lagrangian, how do we find out if energy of the system is conserved.

Example: L=q'^2*sin(q)+q'*exp(q)+q

q' is the time derivative of q.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) Not all Lagrangians can be decomposed in kinetic and potential

(2) This can be a little trickier. Sometimes you'll simply hear that if a Lagrangian does not explicity depend on time then energy is conserved but its not that simple. First of all, if \partial L/\partial t=0 then you'll have a conserved quantity. Let's see what it looks like:

<br /> \frac{dL}{dt}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}\dot{q}+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\ddot{q}+0<br />

We can replace the \partial L/\partial q using the Euler-Lagrange equations, this gives:

<br /> \frac{dL}{dt}=\dot{q}\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\ddot{q}<br />

Recognize the product rule and move some terms around:

<br /> \frac{d}{dt}(\dot{q}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}-L)=0<br />

This gives us a conserved quantity which is often the energy. But not always. If you can get a hold of a copy of Classical Dyanmics by Jose and Saletan they work out the details, but the result is that the above quantity is the energy if

(1) the potential is independent of velocity
(2) the transformation from cartesian to generalized coordinates is time independent.

As for your Lagrangian, I'd be interested in knowing its motivation? Or is it just a random calculation in a textbook?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the explanation. That is the question I asked my professor. Its possible to prove that Hamiltonian is time independent (full derivative with respect to time is 0) from the fact that the partial derivative of Lagrangian is 0. But energy is not always equal to H. It was some random Lagrangian from the practice exam that I modified I little.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top