I How Can We Measure Redshift Using the Spectrum of a Star?

AI Thread Summary
The spectrum of a star reveals absorption lines that indicate the elements present, allowing for the detection of redshift or blueshift. By analyzing the relative strengths and spacing of these spectral features, astronomers can identify elements and determine redshift patterns by comparing them with known stars. If only one absorption line were observed, it would be challenging to ascertain whether a shift was due to redshift/blueshift or a different element entirely. The overall pattern of absorption lines provides crucial information for accurate measurements. Thus, a comprehensive analysis of the entire spectral pattern is essential for determining redshift effectively.
Phys12
Messages
351
Reaction score
42
As far as I know, when we use the spectrum of a star, we see where the absorption lines are and using this, we can detect the elements that are present in the star. We also measure whether those absorption lines are supposed to be for a particular element. But why is it not possible that the star contains a different element altogether because the absorption lines are in a different place instead of the spectrum being redshifted/blueshifted?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The relative strengths and the relative spacing of spectral features provide a lot of information which can be used to help identify them. You can match the patterns with other known stars to work out the redshift.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
The relative strengths and the relative spacing of spectral features provide a lot of information which can be used to help identify them. You can match the patterns with other known stars to work out the redshift.
Oh, so it's because we look at the entire pattern, got it. So, if it were the case, that we looked at just one absorption line (because that's all that we'd have), then we couldn't determine the redshift/blueshift, right?
 
Phys12 said:
Oh, so it's because we look at the entire pattern, got it. So, if it were the case, that we looked at just one absorption line (because that's all that we'd have), then we couldn't determine the redshift/blueshift, right?
We also have clues from the intensity distribution of the spectrum even where there are no clear lines, and if there was only one line it might well be the strongest expected one for that type of object, but certainly the more detail the easier it is to be sure.
 
  • Like
Likes Phys12
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top