How Can We Prove Quadrilateral Similarity Through Circle Intersections?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SonyDvDPro
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the similarity of a quadrilateral formed by the intersections of circles with diameters AB, BC, CD, and DA to the original quadrilateral ABCD. Similarity is defined as having the same angles while the side lengths differ proportionally. The participants emphasize that the lengths of the sides of the new quadrilateral scale together, maintaining the angle relationships. This geometric property underlines the concept of similarity in quadrilaterals. The proof hinges on the consistent angle measures and proportional side lengths derived from the circle intersections.
SonyDvDPro
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Given a quadrilateral ABCD,
Prove that the quadrilateral formed by the intersections other than the vertices A, B, C & D
of the circles with diameter AB, BC, CD & DA
is similar to the quadrilaterar ABCD.

What is the relation of similarity?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
similarity means just the same up to scale hence all angles are the same but the lenghts are different.
 
Mr.Brown said:
similarity means just the same up to scale hence all angles are the same but the lenghts are different.

The lengths of the sides scale together.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top