How Can You Decompose a 4x4 Unitary Matrix for a Quantum Circuit?

CMJ96
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to decompose the following matrix into a product of two level matrices ##V_i##

$$ \begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & \frac{-1}{2} \\
\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{-1}{4} & 0 & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \\
\frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} & 0 & \frac{-3}{4}
\end{bmatrix} $$

Homework Equations


I have only been given the 3x3 case, which I would like to extend to 4x4, in the 3x3 case the decomposition looks like
$$ U_3 U_2 U_1 U = I_n $$
Where ## I_n ## is the identity matrix.
$$ U= V_1 V_2 V_3 $$
Where ##V_i = U_i ^{\dagger} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to eliminate each entry below the ## u_{i=j} ## terms (if that makes any sense).
Since ## u_{2,1} ## is ##0## I can set ##U_1 = I_n##, for ##u_{3,1}## I start to run into trouble, I know that for a 3x3 matrix I can eliminate this term by setting ##U_2## to
$$ \begin{bmatrix}
\frac{u_{1,1}^*}{n} & 0 & \frac{u_{3,1}^*}{n} \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
\frac{u_{3,1}^*}{n}& 0 & -\frac{u_{1,1}^*}{n}
\end{bmatrix} $$
Where ##n=\sqrt{u_{1,1}^2 + u_{3,1}^2 } ##
I have attempted to expand this to a 4x4 matrix, and this is what I got
$$ \begin{bmatrix}
\frac{u_{1,1}}{n} & 0 & 0 & \frac{u_{4,1}}{n}\\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
\frac{u_{4,1}}{n} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{u_{1,1}}{n}
\end{bmatrix} $$
Where ##n= \sqrt{u_{1,1}^2+ u_{4,1}^2 } ##
Is this along the right lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd look for simple solutions here... since you know the 3x3 case, what about converting your problem into the 3x3 case?

i.e.

##\text{Original Matrix} = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & \frac{-1}{2} \\
\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{-1}{4} & 0 & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \\
\frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} & 0 & \frac{-3}{4}
\end{bmatrix} = QP##

where

##Q = \begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & \frac{-1}{2} \\
0& \frac{-1}{4} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} \\
0& \frac{\sqrt{3}}{4} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{-3}{4}
\end{bmatrix} ##

and ##P## is a well chosen permutation matrix. (Note all permutation matrices are orthogonal, which is a special kind of unitary).

This implies that ##Q## is unitary (why?). The reason this setup is nice is that you now have a separable blocked structure that conveniently has a submatrix ## Q_s## which is unitary and 3x3

##Q = \begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & Q_s\\
\end{bmatrix}##

and hence you already know how to solve the problem
- - - -
If this approach is too far afield let me know. If you have questions about the approach, I'm happy to clarify. Finding nice blocked structures can simplify a lot of results about matrices.
 
I see, should I only apply my 3x3 method of decomposition to the ##Q_s## matrix?
 
CMJ96 said:
I see, would I only apply my 3x3 method of decomposition to the ##Q_s## matrix?
right. So if you find, for example: ##Q_s = V_1V_2##
or something like that, then it could be written as

##\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & Q_s\\
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & V_1V_2\\
\end{bmatrix}##

and if you carefully follow the blocked multiplication, you'll see
##
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & V_1V_2\\
\end{bmatrix}=
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & V_1\\
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & \mathbf 0^* \\
\mathbf 0 & V_2\\
\end{bmatrix}##
 
Ahhh yes, I have applied my method to the 3x3 block in the ##Q## matrix, the ##U_1##, ##U_2## and ##U_3## when multiplied together give ##I_n## which looks good, as it happens ##U_1## and ##U_2## don't change when taking ##U_i^{\dagger}## so this has simplified things a bit.

I probably should have mentioned this earlier, I have to use this decomposition to design and construct a quantum circuit that has to be implemented on IBM's quantum experience composer, will this method work fine with that?
In particular I have to give a realisation of each matrix V as controlled operations
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top