How can you effectively approach writing a proof?

AI Thread Summary
Writing an effective proof requires a clear understanding of the problem, including the hypotheses and conclusions. Begin by defining all technical terms and relevant formulas, then explore connections between the hypotheses and the conclusion. Simplifying the proof by considering special cases can provide insights for addressing the general case. Brainstorming and outlining strategies are crucial, as is the meticulous documentation of each step with justifications. Regularly revisiting the work helps identify errors, making the proof-writing process more manageable over time.
MiniTank
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I find proofs very difficult. What process would you go through before writing a proof? What do you do generally?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't any "general theory" or "general procedure"- you have to THINK!

I would recommend the following- first write down the hypotheses (what you are "given") and the conclusion (what you are trying to prove). Now, write down the definitions of all technical words (Yes, I think it is a really good idea to WRITE them just to be sure you have the precise definition- often specific words of the definitions are used in proofs) and any formulas you can think of (or look up!) connecting any quantities given in the proof. NOW try to think of all the ways in which the hypotheses could be connected to the conclusion. Often it helps to look at a simplified version of the proof first- are there any special cases in which the proof is simpler? If so can you vary the proof so as to apply to the more general case?
 


Before writing a proof, it is important to have a clear understanding of the concepts and definitions involved in the problem. This includes reviewing any relevant theorems or properties that may be applicable. It is also helpful to carefully read and analyze the given statement or question to determine what exactly needs to be proven.

Once I have a solid understanding of the problem, I like to start by brainstorming and outlining my approach to the proof. This may involve breaking down the statement into smaller, more manageable parts or considering different strategies for proving it. I also like to consider any counterexamples that may disprove the statement and think about how to address them in my proof.

Next, I begin writing the actual proof, making sure to clearly state each step and justify it using previously established definitions or theorems. It is important to be thorough and meticulous in the logical progression of the proof, as even a small mistake can lead to an incorrect solution.

Throughout the process, I also like to revisit my work and check for any errors or gaps in reasoning. It can be helpful to take breaks and come back to the proof with a fresh perspective, as this can often reveal errors that may have been overlooked.

Overall, my general approach to writing a proof involves careful preparation, strategic thinking, and thorough checking for accuracy. With practice and patience, proofs can become less daunting and more manageable.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top