How Can You Improve Your Amateur Solar Imaging Techniques?

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter davenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Imaging Solar Sun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on improving amateur solar imaging techniques, specifically using equipment such as the Canon 6D and various telephoto lenses with solar filters. Participants share their experiences capturing solar activity, including notable sunspot groups like AR2665 and AR2671, and discuss the importance of using appropriate filters, such as Baader Astrosolar safety film and Coronado Ha filters. Techniques like "lucky imaging" and software tools like FireCapture and Registax are highlighted for enhancing image quality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar imaging equipment, including cameras and telescopes
  • Knowledge of solar filters, specifically Baader Astrosolar and Coronado Ha filters
  • Familiarity with imaging techniques such as "lucky imaging"
  • Experience with image processing software like FireCapture and Registax
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and usage of Baader Astrosolar safety film for solar imaging
  • Learn about the capabilities and features of the Coronado solar scope for dedicated solar viewing
  • Explore the process of "lucky imaging" and its application in astrophotography
  • Investigate advanced image stacking techniques using Registax for improved solar images
USEFUL FOR

Amateur astronomers, astrophotographers, and anyone interested in capturing and improving their solar imaging techniques.

  • #61
davenn said:
I suspect that these are great for planetary/sun but they may not do so well with deep space objects
That's right. There is not a camera which can really do both well. I use the ASI for planetary imaging and an ATIK 414EX M for deep sky imaging.
davenn said:
So I am looking at something that will give me the best of both worlds.
I would suggest that you look for a high frame rate camera with on-board cooling. You really will want the cooler when imaging DSOs using a CMOS type imaging chip. CMOS chips are very noisy and the noise can easily start to overwhelm the faint signal from a DSO.

Here are some of my suggestions although you may find them too pricey...
https://optcorp.com/collections/cameras/products/zwo-asi290mm-cooled-color-astronomy-camera-usb-3-0
https://optcorp.com/collections/cameras/products/atik-titan-monochrome-ccd-camera
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #62
Thanks for responding :)

NFuller said:
That's right. There is not a camera which can really do both well. I use the ASI for planetary imaging and an ATIK 414EX M for deep sky imaging.

Probably not, but hopefully there may be a good compromise, something that is slightly better at DS but still OK for the sun ...
I have never really had the urge for imaging the planets, DS has always been my "love" till recently when I got my first solar scope

NFuller said:
I would suggest that you look for a high frame rate camera with on-board cooling. You really will want the cooler when imaging DSOs using a CMOS type imaging chip. CMOS chips are very noisy and the noise can easily start to overwhelm the faint signal from a DSO.

yeah which is why I always prefer the CCD sensors, but there are a number of very low noise CMOS sensors out there out there
The ZWO ASI178MC falls into that category ... 6.4 MP sensor, 2.2e read noise

NFuller said:
Here are some of my suggestions although you may find them too pricey...

on their own, no, but after having spent $3k on a stand alone solar scope and another $2k this week on another chromosphere filter
funds at the moment for a top line camera are out of range $500 +- $50 is about the limit which that ZWO ASI178 falls into at $529
Time to talk to the experts at the shop where I get my stuff. They are all active astronomers, so I feel safe with their final recommendationsDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NFuller
  • #63
davenn said:
The ZWO ASI178MC falls into that category ... 6.4 MP sensor, 2.2e read noise

well after "talking turkey" with the guy in the shop, I have decided to go with the one above

probably will see it tomorrow and be able to try it out
Crap this hobby can get expensive ! haha AU$5500 in the last monthDave
 
  • #64
davenn said:
well after "talking turkey" with the guy in the shop, I have decided to go with the one above

probably will see it tomorrow and be able to try it out
Great! I hope it works out.
davenn said:
Crap this hobby can get expensive ! haha AU$5500 in the last month
Well, most hobbies worth doing end up that way:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #65
davenn said:
haha AU$5500 in the last month
You will just need to spend lots of time using it in order to justify the cost. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #66
hi guys and gals

OK finally starting to figure out how to use all this new software and hardware for viewing and imaging the sun
finally a first decent image of a prominence today 2017/11/14
gear - Lunt LS60THa solar telescope, ZWO178MC camera and SharpCap software

trying to image in daytime is a real challenge ... dealing with daytime glare on a laptop screen
this is a single image capture

Capture_0013sm.jpg
Dave
 

Attachments

  • Capture_0013sm.jpg
    Capture_0013sm.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 490
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000, Andy Resnick and Stavros Kiri
  • #67
just a quick pic of the setup, the laptop inside cardboard box for some shielding of the screen from the sunlightI needed to stick my head into the box up close to the screen to stop the sunlight reflections off me getting onto the screen ...

IMAG0312sm.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0312sm.jpg
    IMAG0312sm.jpg
    47.1 KB · Views: 460
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000
  • #68
Lovely image, Dave.
The hi-tek box and wheelie bin are very impressive too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #69
sophiecentaur said:
The hi-tek box and wheelie bin are very impressive too.
"necessity is the mother of invention" ... so I am told :smile:

it was suggested elsewhere that ...
1) I paint the inside of the box matt black and
2) I use a dark cloth shroud over the box and my head to further darked things ... think of photographers of old :smile:Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000
  • #70
You could buy a 'toilet tent' as a form of observatory and work the whole think from inside. The scope could poke through a flap. If you cut the bottom off the fabric, you would get good air circulation. These things are available in UK for very low prices so they should be cheap anywhere in the world and you wouldn't need guy it.
PS Don't expect sympathy from a heavily autumnal UK, for having a lot of Sun.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #71
Solar activity -- 20 Nov. 2017

a quick shot of the prominence and long winding filament on today's sun
gear - Lunt LS60THa solar telescope, ZWO178MC camera and SharpCap software

this is just a single frame

Capture_0019sm.jpg


Dave
 

Attachments

  • Capture_0019sm.jpg
    Capture_0019sm.jpg
    47.1 KB · Views: 514
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000 and Stavros Kiri
  • #72
Smashing picture Dave.
Your cost per recorded pixel is dropping fast! :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
  • #73
sophiecentaur said:
Smashing picture Dave.
Your cost per recorded pixel is dropping fast! :wink:

thanks buddy :smile:ahhh yes it is :biggrin:

one of the next steps is to figure out using the software to load in a short .avi video file
and it extracts the individual frames and stacks them. When I get to do this, we should see a big
improvement in image quality

At this time just getting used to using the scope, astro camera and software to capture single images

today's image isn't as sharp as the last one, by the time I got home from work today ~ 5pm, the sun
was getting low in the west and the light coming through much more atmosphere causing the usual instabilityDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000
  • #74
davenn said:
load in a short .avi video file
and it extracts the individual frames and stacks them.
I have read that good stacking software will select the best and reject the worst in a video sequence. That IS clever!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #75
The Sun, 22/11/2017, about the best image so far

Reasonably good seeing conditions today
1f642.png

quite pleased with the result

171122 1730AEDT The Sun in Ha.jpg
Dave
 

Attachments

  • 171122 1730AEDT The Sun in Ha.jpg
    171122 1730AEDT The Sun in Ha.jpg
    27.8 KB · Views: 505
  • 1f642.png
    1f642.png
    328 bytes · Views: 428
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000, sophiecentaur, Andy Resnick and 1 other person
  • #76
davenn said:
today's image isn't as sharp as the last one, by the time I got home from work today ~ 5pm, the sun
was getting low in the west and the light coming through much more atmosphere causing the usual instability
Still pretty good and interesting. The previous one was kind of too bright I think. Is that the normal?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #77
Stavros Kiri said:
Still pretty good and interesting. The previous one was kind of too bright I think. Is that the normal?

the centre is always going to be brighter than around the limb.
it's tricky ... bringing up the brightness so the prominences can be seen well and the face is way too bright
lower the brightness so the face is well exposed and the limb prominences fade away
this image is a trade off between the 2 extremes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
  • #78
davenn said:
image is a trade off between the 2 extremes
What's the best time of the day (regular normal day/conditions) to naturally fall in between, if possible?
 
  • #79
Stavros Kiri said:
What's the best time of the day (regular normal day/conditions) to naturally fall in between, if possible?

when the object of interest is high in the sky ... sun moon, planets, deep space object

that is when you are viewing/imaging through the least amount of atmosphere, the lower you go towards the horizon, the thicker the layer of
atmosphere you are viewing through and hence more instability

the image in post #71 was late in afternoon, around 5:30 - 6pm and the sun was getting pretty low
hence the quality was not good.
Today's image was at 430pm still getting a bit low but not as bad, so the stability was much betterDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
  • #80
Thanks Dave. What you say makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #81
@Stavros Kiri

The next things that is done, and it's next on my list for experiments is... doing small video clips, 500 frames or so
then these are stacked in programs like Autostakkert! 2 or Registax, it picks out the best 10 - 20% of the frames and stacks themDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
  • #82
davenn said:
@Stavros Kiri

The next things that is done, and it's next on my list for experiments is... doing small video clips, 500 frames or so
then these are stacked in programs like Autostakkert! 2 or Registax, it picks out the best 10 - 20% of the frames and stacks themDave
That would be neat! I'm looking forward to it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #83
The Sun 24 Nov 2017

trying a B&W version instead of colour ... sort of have the feeling it gives better contrast of the visible structure ?

171124 Ha.jpg


A reasonable prominence upper left, a sprinkling of smaller ones elsewhere

some small filaments here and there but the major feature is the long lasting filamentDave

PS ... Just to clarify ... I didn't image this in B&W ( greyscale) It was imaged in colour and then fully desaturated in Lightroom whilst doing the other processing edits
 

Attachments

  • 171124 Ha.jpg
    171124 Ha.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 591
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000 and Stavros Kiri
  • #84
The Sun 10 Dec 2017, 05:10 UT

Several really nice prominences on the sun today ... was first chance to do imaging in over 2 weeks ...
Has been a mix of nothing much to image and when there was, it was cloudy for me
But finally a clear sky and good prom's

Capture_0001SM.jpg


During the 30 mins I was observing/imaging, that smaller upper right one disappeared
and the lower left one, I could see changes as material was falling back towards the sun's limb

Dave
 

Attachments

  • Capture_0001SM.jpg
    Capture_0001SM.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 526
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000, ISamson and Stavros Kiri
  • #85
full disk image from the 10 Dec

171210 Cap18sm.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 171210 Cap18sm.jpg
    171210 Cap18sm.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 521
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000, ISamson and Stavros Kiri
  • #87
NFuller said:
I took this one about a year ago. Not too much happening here but I think the image came out well.
View attachment 211366
this is fantastic
 
  • #88
The Sun in Ha -- 11 Dec 2017
There were 5 respectable prominences around the limb today

171211 Ha.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 171211 Ha.jpg
    171211 Ha.jpg
    31.9 KB · Views: 480
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrtea2000, Stavros Kiri and Andy Resnick
  • #89
davenn said:
The Sun in Ha -- 11 Dec 2017
There were 5 respectable prominences around the limb today
]

You're encouraging me to take out a loan for some solar etalons...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #90
Andy Resnick said:
You're encouraging me to take out a loan for some solar etalons...
that's good to hear
I would welcome more active solar observers :smile:I am so wanting to see more people post their solar images in this thread
White light, Ha etc :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K