How Can You Maximize a Linear Equation with Multiple Constraints?

abhishek2301
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I want to maximize a linear equation: 4*a + 8*b + 7*c + 5*d + 9*e with the following constraints:
0<=(4*a + 8*b + 7*c + 5*d + 9*e)<=1
0<=a<=100; 0<=b<=100; 0<=c<=100; 0<=d<=100; 0<=e<=100

Can I solve this problem using linear programming?
Is there are any other method to do it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are an infinite number of solutions. An obvious one would be to take b = c = d = e = 0 and a = 0.25.
 
abhishek2301 said:
Hello,

I want to maximize a linear equation: 4*a + 8*b + 7*c + 5*d + 9*e with the following constraints:
0<=(4*a + 8*b + 7*c + 5*d + 9*e)<=1
0<=a<=100; 0<=b<=100; 0<=c<=100; 0<=d<=100; 0<=e<=100

Can I solve this problem using linear programming?
Is there are any other method to do it?

Thanks!



Well, there're lots of solutions to your problem, for example:

\displaystyle{a=\frac{1}{4}\,,\,b=c=d=e=0}

\displaystyle{b=\frac{1}{8}\,,\,a=c=d=e=0}

etc...

\displaystyle{a=\frac{1}{8}\,,\,b=\frac{1}{16} \, ,\, c=d=e=0}

etc...until one dies out of boredom.

DonAntonio
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top