How can you measure the volume of a floating irregular object?

AI Thread Summary
To measure the volume of a floating irregular object, submerging it in water to determine the volume of displaced water is a valid method, as this volume corresponds to the object's volume. Alternative methods include using a denser fluid, like petrol, to facilitate submersion without the need for external pressure. Care must be taken to account for the volume of any tool used to submerge the object, ideally employing a thin implement for precision. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately measuring displacement to ensure correct volume calculations. Overall, the submerged volume directly reflects the object's volume, regardless of density differences.
arjose
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How does one experimentally measure an irregular object's volume given that said object floats on water?

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that the simplest solution to this is to submerge the whole object by pressing down on it to the point that only the object is submerged. I'm thinking that the volume of displaced water would equate to the volume of said object, regardless of densities or forces being applied. Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
arjose said:

Homework Statement


How does one experimentally measure an irregular object's volume given that said object floats on water?

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems to me that the simplest solution to this is to submerge the whole object by pressing down on it to the point that only the object is submerged. I'm thinking that the volume of displaced water would equate to the volume of said object, regardless of densities or forces being applied. Am I correct?

Yeah, that's correct. The volume occupied by the submerged object was previously occupied by water.
 
cepheid said:
Yeah, that's correct. The volume occupied by the submerged object was previously occupied by water.
Thank you for verifying that.
 
Or, perhaps find some other fluid that the material is more dense than, say petrol or similar?
 
sjb-2812 said:
Or, perhaps find some other fluid that the material is more dense than, say petrol or similar?
Haven't thought of it that way. Makes sense though. Any other fluid that's less dense than water should do the trick of submerging the object. Thanks for that.
 
If you press the object down under the water, you must take into account the volume of whatever you are pressing it down with! You might want to use something very thin, like a needle but then it becomes difficult to hit the exact center.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top