How can you test if a bipartite system is entangled?

ouacc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
say an ensemble consisting of N IDENTICAL bipartite systems. The system can be in either of the two situations.

A) Two particles in a bipartite system are entangled as |psi>= 1/sqrt(2) ( |00> + |11> )
so the density matrix is
rho1 = |psi> <psi| = 1/2 *{1 0 0 1} * {1; 0; 0; 1}
= 0.5* { 1 0 0 1; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 1 0 0 1}

B) The bipartite system is in a mixed state. But the initial states of the two particles are the same.
they are either in |00> or |11> with probability 1/2 respectively.
So, the density matrix is
rho2= 0.5 {1 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1}

In summary, there are either N pairs of entangled particles or N pairs of independent but in-the-same-initial-state particles. Assume N is large enough.

How to design measurements on the ensemble, so that I can tell whether it is entangled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ouacc said:
say an ensemble consisting of N IDENTICAL bipartite systems. The system can be in either of the two situations.

A) Two particles in a bipartite system are entangled as |psi>= 1/sqrt(2) ( |00> + |11> )
so the density matrix is
rho1 = |psi> <psi| = 1/2 *{1 0 0 1} * {1; 0; 0; 1}
= 0.5* { 1 0 0 1; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 1 0 0 1}

B) The bipartite system is in a mixed state. But the initial states of the two particles are the same.
they are either in |00> or |11> with probability 1/2 respectively.
So, the density matrix is
rho2= 0.5 {1 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1}

In summary, there are either N pairs of entangled particles or N pairs of independent but in-the-same-initial-state particles. Assume N is large enough.

How to design measurements on the ensemble, so that I can tell whether it is entangled?

So we have:
rho1 = 1/2*(|00>+|11>)(<00|+<11|)= shorter notation =1/2*|00+11><00+11|
rho2 = 1/2*(|00><00| + |11><11|)

Consider observable:
A = 1/2*|00+11><00+11| -1/2*|00-11><00-11|

Tr(A*rho1) = 1/2
Tr(A*rho2) = 0
=> we get different mean values, for more measurements we can distinguish between the two cases.
However, this is just a theoretical observable. If you mean the actual technical realisation of such a measurement on the system I have no idea how to do it.
 
Thanks. But I couldn't figure out how to get the observables you mentioned in a real experiment.

tomasko789 said:
So we have:
rho1 = 1/2*(|00>+|11>)(<00|+<11|)= shorter notation =1/2*|00+11><00+11|
rho2 = 1/2*(|00><00| + |11><11|)

Consider observable:
A = 1/2*|00+11><00+11| -1/2*|00-11><00-11|

Tr(A*rho1) = 1/2
Tr(A*rho2) = 0
=> we get different mean values, for more measurements we can distinguish between the two cases.
However, this is just a theoretical observable. If you mean the actual technical realisation of such a measurement on the system I have no idea how to do it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top