How can you test if a bipartite system is entangled?

ouacc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
say an ensemble consisting of N IDENTICAL bipartite systems. The system can be in either of the two situations.

A) Two particles in a bipartite system are entangled as |psi>= 1/sqrt(2) ( |00> + |11> )
so the density matrix is
rho1 = |psi> <psi| = 1/2 *{1 0 0 1} * {1; 0; 0; 1}
= 0.5* { 1 0 0 1; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 1 0 0 1}

B) The bipartite system is in a mixed state. But the initial states of the two particles are the same.
they are either in |00> or |11> with probability 1/2 respectively.
So, the density matrix is
rho2= 0.5 {1 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1}

In summary, there are either N pairs of entangled particles or N pairs of independent but in-the-same-initial-state particles. Assume N is large enough.

How to design measurements on the ensemble, so that I can tell whether it is entangled?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ouacc said:
say an ensemble consisting of N IDENTICAL bipartite systems. The system can be in either of the two situations.

A) Two particles in a bipartite system are entangled as |psi>= 1/sqrt(2) ( |00> + |11> )
so the density matrix is
rho1 = |psi> <psi| = 1/2 *{1 0 0 1} * {1; 0; 0; 1}
= 0.5* { 1 0 0 1; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 1 0 0 1}

B) The bipartite system is in a mixed state. But the initial states of the two particles are the same.
they are either in |00> or |11> with probability 1/2 respectively.
So, the density matrix is
rho2= 0.5 {1 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1}

In summary, there are either N pairs of entangled particles or N pairs of independent but in-the-same-initial-state particles. Assume N is large enough.

How to design measurements on the ensemble, so that I can tell whether it is entangled?

So we have:
rho1 = 1/2*(|00>+|11>)(<00|+<11|)= shorter notation =1/2*|00+11><00+11|
rho2 = 1/2*(|00><00| + |11><11|)

Consider observable:
A = 1/2*|00+11><00+11| -1/2*|00-11><00-11|

Tr(A*rho1) = 1/2
Tr(A*rho2) = 0
=> we get different mean values, for more measurements we can distinguish between the two cases.
However, this is just a theoretical observable. If you mean the actual technical realisation of such a measurement on the system I have no idea how to do it.
 
Thanks. But I couldn't figure out how to get the observables you mentioned in a real experiment.

tomasko789 said:
So we have:
rho1 = 1/2*(|00>+|11>)(<00|+<11|)= shorter notation =1/2*|00+11><00+11|
rho2 = 1/2*(|00><00| + |11><11|)

Consider observable:
A = 1/2*|00+11><00+11| -1/2*|00-11><00-11|

Tr(A*rho1) = 1/2
Tr(A*rho2) = 0
=> we get different mean values, for more measurements we can distinguish between the two cases.
However, this is just a theoretical observable. If you mean the actual technical realisation of such a measurement on the system I have no idea how to do it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top