How Can You Use Contour Integration to Evaluate the Integral of 1/(X^4 + a^4)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueyellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral of \( \frac{1}{x^4 + a^4} \) using contour integration techniques in the complex plane. The original poster expresses difficulty in applying methods similar to those used for simpler integrals, such as \( \frac{1}{x^2 + a^2} \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of different contour shapes, including a square contour and a semicircular contour, to evaluate the integral. There is a mention of the number of poles involved and the implications of choosing different contours.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various contour integration strategies and questioning the effectiveness of different approaches. There is no explicit consensus on the best method yet, but several lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of the number of poles in the integrand and how this affects the choice of contour for integration. The original poster seeks guidance on how to initiate the problem effectively.

blueyellow
Use suitable contours in the complex plane and the residue theorem to show that (where a
is a real number):


integral from +infinity to -infinity (1/(X^4+a^4))=pi/((a^3)sqrt(2))


i hav tried to do something similar to what one would do for the integral of 1/(x^2+a^2) but it didnt work.please just help me get started on this question. ta in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand why it wouldn't work. You normally have 4 poles.
 
integrate around a square with corners at
0,R,iR,R+iR
and let R->infinity
 
lurflurf said:
integrate around a square with corners at
0,R,iR,R+iR
and let R->infinity

Isn't it easier to just use the upper infinite semi-circle, -infinity to +infinity along the real axis and then close the contour with a semicircle enclosing two of the functions four poles.
 
^Some people like to do it that way, but then you have to deal with two poles instead of one. The savings would be even greater if we wanted to do 1/(x^1024+a^1024).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K