How come light only reflects off surfaces and not internal planes?

AI Thread Summary
Light primarily reflects off the surfaces of materials due to the significant changes in refractive index at these boundaries, which enhances reflection compared to internal planes. While light can penetrate deeper into a material, absorption reduces its intensity, making reflections from internal planes negligible. This phenomenon is similar to sound reflecting off walls rather than layers of the atmosphere. The reflection at impedance boundaries is much stronger than any scattering that occurs within the material. Consequently, for practical applications, reflections from internal layers are often disregarded.
jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
When light approaches and enters a material, why does all the reflection happen at the surfaces? I mean, light is coming at say, some crystalline solid. It hits the first plane of atoms and some is reflected. Some goes into the crystal and passes through the 2nd, 3rd, 4th,..., (n-1)th plane of atoms completely unreflected. Then it hits the far boundary (the nth) plane of atoms and some gets reflected. What is so special about the front and back planes of atoms?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Light gets reflected from all the planes. Only the deeper it is, the less light there is left because of absorption, or skin depth. For a metal, this layer is very thin, so only the planes near the surface are relevant.
 
Many x-ray spectrometers use Bragg diffraction (or reflection), nλ = 2d sin(θ), off the crystal planes; quartz 310, silicon 111, among others.

Bob S
 
ahh Bragg diffraction of course, I remember that...
 
There tends to be greater light reflection at boundaries between different media where there is a change of refractive index.
 
Analogously - why does sound only reflect off the walls, not each "layer" of atmosphere it's traveling through?

Part 1 - It does.

Part 2 - The effect of reflection from an impedance boundary is vastly greater than the effect of scatter in the bulk of the material. The difference is sufficient to ignore for almost all applications.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top