How could you see an image without photons? (imaging systems)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of imaging systems that could potentially allow for visualization without the use of photons. Participants explore the limitations of current imaging technologies in observing the universe before the formation of the first stars and the Big Bang, and consider alternative methods that might be employed by advanced civilizations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that advanced imaging systems could potentially utilize dark matter, though there is skepticism about the existence of dark matter and the detection of axions.
  • Others mention that gravitational waves could provide information from before deionization, but question the current capability of gravitational wave technology to form images.
  • Electron microscopy and atomic force microscopes are cited as existing imaging systems that do not rely on photons, but they are noted to be limited in their application to the discussion topic.
  • One participant raises the question of what is meant by "see," suggesting that direct stimulation of the visual cortex could allow for visualization without photons, referencing the experience of dreaming as an example.
  • It is suggested that various types of radiation, including protons, electrons, neutrons, and neutrinos, could be used for imaging if there is a method to map their locations upon detection.
  • Participants discuss the potential for using different types of waves, such as sound waves and gravitational waves, for imaging purposes, emphasizing the need for a mapping technique.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and methods of imaging without photons, with no clear consensus reached. There are competing ideas regarding the types of radiation and waves that could be utilized for imaging, as well as differing opinions on the capabilities of current technologies.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unresolved nature of dark matter detection, the dependence on definitions of "seeing," and the current technological constraints in imaging systems. The discussion does not resolve the effectiveness of proposed methods or the existence of certain phenomena.

Maximum7
Messages
124
Reaction score
11
What kind of imaging system could be used to see without photons? I ask because I was watching a video and the furthest we can see back is Redshift Z~1090 which is the CMB. We can’t see the universe before the first stars formed or the Big Bang itself. My first guess would be some kind of dark matter imaging system BUT there seems to be no trace of the axion so perhaps dark matter does not exist. Is there any way an advanced civilization could do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maximum7 said:
What kind of imaging system could be used to see without photons? I ask because I was watching a video and the furthest we can see back is Redshift Z~1090 which is the CMB. We can’t see the universe before the first stars formed or the Big Bang itself. My first guess would be some kind of dark matter imaging system BUT there seems to be no trace of the axion so perhaps dark matter does not exist. Is there any way an advanced civilization could do this?
There can still be gravity waves from before deionization.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits, BillTre and topsquark
There are imaging systems that work without photons, but they won't do what you want with respect to seeing before CMB.
Electron microscopy
Atomic force microscopes
There are probably others.

I don't think gravitational wave technology is able to form images yet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and topsquark
Maximum7 said:
What kind of imaging system could be used to see without photons?
What do you mean by "see"? Do you mean to record the image, or for a human to actually "see" the information? If the latter, there are ways to directly stimulate the visual cortex in the human brain; we're just not very skilled in doing that yet. And I see very detailed images when I'm dreaming, and no photons are directly involved in that... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
berkeman said:
What do you mean by "see"? Do you mean to record the image, or for a human to actually "see" the information? If the latter, there are ways to directly stimulate the visual cortex in the human brain; we're just not very skilled in doing that yet. And I see very detailed images when I'm dreaming, and no photons are directly involved in that... :wink:

Record an image
 
Maximum7 said:
Record an image
1668738756245.png

https://media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com/...nts_9a_baby_faces_220922_1920x1080-47a34q.jpg
 
berkeman said:
And I see very detailed images when I'm dreaming, and no photons are directly involved in that...
Well, with you, Mike, it's hard to tell just WHAT might be involved. :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Hornbein said:
There can still be gravity waves from before deionization.
And the neutrino background which happened before the CMB.
 
Any type of radiation, be it protons, electrons, neutrons, neutrinos, etc can be used to create an image if you have a way of mapping their original location at reflection/emission to their final location upon detection. Telescopes and other optical devices achieve this by focusing light using mirrors or lenses while electron microscopes do this using various methods that I won't go into. We also already have neutron imaging as well.

Just about any type of wave can be used for imaging too. Sound waves, gravitational waves, gravity waves (waves on the surface of water), etc. Again, all you need is some way to map the wave's location at various points at the target location to whatever you're using to 'image' with.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm, Hornbein, BillTre and 2 others
  • #10
Drakkith said:
Any type of radiation, be it protons, electrons, neutrons, neutrinos, etc can be used to create an image if you have a way of mapping their original location at reflection/emission to their final location upon detection. Telescopes and other optical devices achieve this by focusing light using mirrors or lenses while electron microscopes do this using various methods that I won't go into. We also already have neutron imaging as well.

Just about any type of wave can be used for imaging too. Sound waves, gravitational waves, gravity waves (waves on the surface of water), etc. Again, all you need is some way to map the wave's location at various points at the target location to whatever you're using to 'image' with.
Neutrinos? That would be a good trick!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lren Zvsm and Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K