How could you visit yourself 10 mins ago?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter seanbateman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario of time travel, specifically the concept of visiting oneself 10 minutes in the past within the framework of Kurt Gödel's universe. Participants examine the implications of such time travel on physical laws and causality, while also engaging in a broader debate about the nature of imaginary universes and their rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if time travel were possible in Gödel's universe, one could theoretically visit oneself 10 minutes in the past, but this raises questions about the conservation of mass and energy.
  • Others argue that the atoms comprising a person in the past cannot simply reappear without violating physical laws, as this would increase mass in the universe.
  • A participant suggests that if one is to imagine a universe, it could be more interesting to create one with different laws of physics that do not conflict with causality.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the Gödel metric allows for closed timelike curves (CTCs) and does not violate known physical laws, as it is a solution to Einstein's field equations.
  • There is a discussion about whether CTCs can be geodesics and the implications of general relativity on energy conservation in such scenarios.
  • A later reply questions the meaningfulness of the original question, suggesting that in a Gödel universe, the concept of causality may not apply, rendering the question less relevant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the implications of Gödel's universe on time travel. While some acknowledge the theoretical possibility of time travel, others challenge the assumptions and the nature of the original question, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of the discussion, reliance on hypothetical scenarios, and the unresolved status of certain physical principles in the context of closed timelike curves.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in theoretical physics, time travel concepts, and the implications of general relativity may find this discussion engaging.

seanbateman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hypothetically let's say you were in Kurt Godel’s universe and time travel was possible.
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/4307/ti ...
An image that may help explain what I’m saying

Imagine going back in time to visit yourself 10 minutes ago.
Just to made it easier to visualise let's imagine ten minutes ago you were down the shops, you walk back home, remember this bit you push a cup off the table what lands on the floor and then you go into your time machine to travel back in time 10 minutes to when you were still down the shops.
Now on traveling back in time the energy that went from the cup into the floor goes back into the cup and the cup rises and goes back into the table.
But the atoms that made up you ten minutes ago are still in status in the time machine, so they can’t go back down the shop for you to visit them.
The atoms that made up you 10 minutes ago will not just appear this would create more mass in the universe and due to E=MC^2 there is more energy in the universe going again fundamental laws in physics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
seanbateman said:
Hypothetically let's say you were in Kurt Godel’s universe and time travel was possible.
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/4307/ti ...
An image that may help explain what I’m saying

Imagine going back in time to visit yourself 10 minutes ago.
Just to made it easier to visualise let's imagine ten minutes ago you were down the shops, you walk back home, remember this bit you push a cup off the table what lands on the floor and then you go into your time machine to travel back in time 10 minutes to when you were still down the shops.
Now on traveling back in time the energy that went from the cup into the floor goes back into the cup and the cup rises and goes back into the table.
But the atoms that made up you ten minutes ago are still in status in the time machine, so they can’t go back down the shop for you to visit them.
The atoms that made up you 10 minutes ago will not just appear this would create more mass in the universe and due to E=MC^2 there is more energy in the universe going again fundamental laws in physics.

You can't?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you're going to postulate an imaginary universe, why not pick one where you get to choose the laws of physics?
 
AJ Bentley said:
If you're going to postulate an imaginary universe, why not pick one where you get to choose the laws of physics?

In my universe, the laws of physics don't cornhole causality, but cows can produce chocolate milk. :)
 
Ah, All's for the best in the best of all possible worlds!
 
This is pretty sad. A newbie posts a good question of PF, and instantly attracts a series of replies that are both (a) incorrect and (b) sarcastic put-downs.

nismaratwork said:
You can't?
You could, if our spacetime had the Godel metric.

AJ Bentley said:
If you're going to postulate an imaginary universe, why not pick one where you get to choose the laws of physics?
The Godel metric obeys the known laws of physics. It's an exact solution to the Einstein field equations.

@Seanbateman:

Welcome to PF, and thanks for posting an interesting question!

The Godel metric has CTCs through every point in spacetime. Therefore you don't have to start from any special location in spacetime in order to have your world-line be a CTC.

I don't know if it has CTCs that are also geodesics. If so, then all you'd have to do is have the right initial velocity vector, and you'd experience a CTC.

GR doesn't have global conservation of energy, so the fact that CTCs lead to nonconservation doesn't imply a violation of the laws of physics.

There is a good discussion of this in Black Holes and Time Warps. by Kip Thorne.
 
bcrowell said:
This is pretty sad. A newbie posts a good question of PF, and instantly attracts a series of replies that are both (a) incorrect and (b) sarcastic put-downs.


You could, if our spacetime had the Godel metric.


The Godel metric obeys the known laws of physics. It's an exact solution to the Einstein field equations.

@Seanbateman:

Welcome to PF, and thanks for posting an interesting question!

The Godel metric has CTCs through every point in spacetime. Therefore you don't have to start from any special location in spacetime in order to have your world-line be a CTC.

I don't know if it has CTCs that are also geodesics. If so, then all you'd have to do is have the right initial velocity vector, and you'd experience a CTC.

GR doesn't have global conservation of energy, so the fact that CTCs lead to nonconservation doesn't imply a violation of the laws of physics.

There is a good discussion of this in Black Holes and Time Warps. by Kip Thorne.

If you were in a Godel universe, then "going back 10 minutes" wouldn't be the issue; you would probably be trapped for an indefinite period of time in one CTC after another. There would be no causality in such a universe, so the question is meaningless, much as the question of what life would be like beyond the event horizon of a black hole. Is there something beyond it, probably, but is it in any way formulated to agree with the question? No. He's new, that doesn't make it a good question, which as you've pointed out, has better discussions occurring elsewhere in the forum.
 
Cat fight! Cat fight!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K