How Did Archimedes Use His Principle to Compare Densities of Gold and Silver?

AI Thread Summary
Archimedes' principle states that an object submerged in fluid displaces a volume of fluid equal to its own volume. In the discussion, it is clarified that Archimedes used this principle to compare the densities of gold and silver by immersing equal masses of both metals in water. Since gold is denser than silver, the gold lump displaces less water than the silver lump, which has a greater volume due to its lower density. The confusion arises from the assumption that the two pieces were the same volume; they were actually of equal mass, leading to different volumes displaced. This principle effectively demonstrates how density differences can be observed through water displacement.
roger5
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Can somebody explain Achimedes principle to me? Where he used it to determine the difference in density between silver and gold. Apparently he immersed a lump of gold and silver in water (I assume they were the same size/volume) and each lump displaced a different volume of water. Is that the correct story? If it is, how can two objects with the same volume displace a different amount of water?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The pieces of gold and silver did not have the same volume, they had the same mass.

The silver is obviously less dense, therefore has a greater volume, therefore displaces more water.
 
That's what I thought. Thanks
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top