How Did Each Logician Distribute the Oranges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter K Sengupta
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a logical puzzle involving four logicians and 11 oranges, each logician knows how many oranges they ate but not how many the others consumed. The discussion revolves around their questions to deduce the number of oranges each person ate. Addison asks Braxton if he ate more oranges, to which Braxton responds uncertainly, indicating he must have eaten at least 2. Carlos, following up, also expresses uncertainty, suggesting he ate at least 3. Darryl, who ultimately figures out the distribution, must have eaten 5 oranges to deduce the others' counts. The final distribution reveals that Addison ate 1, Braxton and Carlos each ate 2, and Darryl ate 6. The reasoning hinges on the implications of their uncertainty, leading to a logical conclusion about their consumption.
K Sengupta
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Four perfect logicians sat around a table that had a dish with 11 oranges in it. The chat was intense, and they ended up eating all of the oranges. Everybody had at least one orange, and everyone knew that fact, and each logician knew the number of oranges that he ate. They didn't know how many oranges each of the other ate, though. They agreed to ask only questions that they didn't know the answers to.

Their queries are as follows:

Addison:: Did you eat more oranges that I did, Braxton?

Braxton:: I don't know. Did you, Carlos, eat more oranges than I did?

Carlos: I don't know.

Darryl : Aha!

Darryl figured out how many oranges each person ate.

Can you also deduce the number of oranges consumed by each logician?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer (in white)

Braxton must have had at least 2 since if he only had 1, he would know the answer to the question posed him. He must have had less than 5 or he would not be able to ask the question he asked.
Carlos knew that Braxton must have had at least 2 so he must have had at least 3, or he would know the answer to the question posed him. He must also have had less than 6 or he would have known the answer to the question.
Darryl must have had 5 because in any other case, he couldn't disambiguate between possible cases. For instance, if Darryl had 4 oranges, there are at least two possibilites:
A B C D
2 2 3 4
1 2 4 4

If Darryl had 3 oranges:
A B C D
3 2 3 3
2 2 4 3

If Darryl had 2 oranges:
A B C D
3 2 4 2
2 3 4 2

If Darryl had 1 orange:
A B C D
3 3 4 1
2 4 4 1

Since Darryl knew, Darryl must have had 5 oranges
A B C D
1 2 3 5

eom.
 
K Sengupta said:
Can you also deduce the number of oranges consumed by each logician?

Addison ate 1, Braxton ate 2, Carlos ate 2, Darryl ate 6

Darryl knows he ate 6, so there are only 5 left to have been eaten between the other 3. Initially, Darryl knows the possibilities could be (in order of Addison, Braxton, Carlos):

1, 1, 3
1, 3, 1
3, 1, 1
1, 2, 2
2, 1, 2
2, 2, 1

When Braxton states that he doesn't know if he ate more than Addison, this proves that Braxton ate at *least* 2, because otherwise Braxton could definitively say that he did NOT eat more than Addison. Hence, Darryl knows the possibilities are:

1, 3, 1
1, 2, 2
2, 2, 1

When Carlos states that he doesn't know if he ate more than Braxton, this shows (again) that Carlos ate at *least* 2. So Darryl is left with only one possibility:

1, 2, 2


DaveE
 
jimmysnyder said:
Answer (in white)

Since Darryl knew, Darryl must have had 5 oranges
A B C D
1 2 3 5


I think that's not quite right-- if Darryl had 5 oranges, he's left with the possible situations of:

A B C D
1 2 3 5
1 3 2 5
2 2 2 5

He can't determine which of those is correct.


DaveE
 
davee123 said:
I think that's not quite right
Carlos knew that Braxton had at least 2 for the same reason that you do. Therefore he must have had at least 3.
eom
 
jimmysnyder said:
Carlos knew that Braxton had at least 2 for the same reason that you do. Therefore he must have had at least 3.
eom


Ahhh, true! Good catch!


DaveE
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top