How did Meitner calculated the amount of energy lost....

In summary, based on the video and the written information, scientists were trying to determine how much energy was lost in the nuclear fission of uranium. They used E=mc^2 to calculate the mass lost.
  • #1
Peter Ke
6
0
It's my first time here, so I'm not sure if this is the right place to post it. If I post it in the wrong section, then I'm sorry.

Anyways, I just have a curious question. Based on this video I watched --> ""

at around 1:40:42 , I really want to know how she actually calculated the amount of energy lost during the nuclear fission of the uranium atom by using E=mc^2. I'm just curious that's all because the video doesn't show the actual calculation. So, if one of you guys can show the process of the mathematics, that would be great!

Thx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

She says what calculation she's doing, but I can't understand it with her accent. Somehow she's calculating how much mass is lost in the fission process, perhaps by knowing the mass of the uranium and the products and simply subtracting. Then you just plug that number into e=mc^2. Here's an example:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/higher/physics/radiation/nuclear_reactions/revision/2/
 
  • #3
She says clearly that the two nuclei (produced in the fission) are lighter than the original nucleus of uranium by about 1/5 of the proton in mass. When you know this number it is just plug and chug
 
  • #4
Borek said:
She says clearly that the two nuclei (produced in the fission) are lighter than the original nucleus of uranium by about 1/5 of the proton in mass.
Yeah - it was what she said right before that, before she calculated that result that I couldn't understand. Sounds like "let me do a packing friction calculation", but I don't think that's right...
 
  • #5
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #6
russ_watters said:
Yeah - it was what she said right before that, before she calculated that result that I couldn't understand. Sounds like "let me do a packing friction calculation", but I don't think that's right...
LISE MEITNER: "Wait, let me do a packing fraction calculation. The two nuclei are lighter than the original uranium nucleus by about one-fifth of a proton in mass".
[ref: Nova transcript]​

I can't find the original letter that sparked the conversation, sent on 19 December, 1938, but I did find the paper published a few months later:

Concerning the Existence of Alkaline Earth Metals Resulting from Neutron Irradiation of Uranium
published 6 January 1939

I'm afraid I can't follow it.

Wiki gives a clue:
Otto Hahn, Discovery of nuclear fission
Further refinements of the technique, leading to the decisive experiment on 16–17 December 1938 (the celebrated "radium-barium-mesothorium-fractionation"), produced puzzling results: the three isotopes consistently behaved not as radium, but as barium. Hahn, who did not inform the physicists in his Institute, described the results exclusively in a letter to Meitner on 19 December: "...we are more and more coming to the awful conclusion that our Ra isotopes behave not like Ra, but like Ba. ... Perhaps you can suggest some fantastic explanation. We ourselves realize that it can't really burst into Ba." In her reply, Meitner concurred that Hahn's conclusion of the bursting of the uranium nucleus was very difficult to accept, but considered it possible.
On 22 December 1938, Hahn sent a manuscript to Naturwissenschaften reporting their radiochemical results, which were published on 6 January 1939.

I knew the theory behind mass defect, but not the history of its discovery.
Very interesting.
But how they determined the details, is still beyond me.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #7
Borek said:
She says clearly that the two nuclei (produced in the fission) are lighter than the original nucleus of uranium by about 1/5 of the proton in mass. When you know this number it is just plug and chug

I plugged and chugged and came up with 169 mev, based on wiki's most convenient: U236 fission into Ba141 + Kr92 + 3 Neutrons image

Specifics available upon request. :angel:

---------------------
[edit]
And given that I'm prone to forgetting where everything is:
file: pf.random.homework.problems.numbers
tab: fission of U236
 

1. How did Meitner calculate the amount of energy lost during nuclear fission?

Meitner used the Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2, to calculate the amount of energy lost during nuclear fission. She also used her knowledge of nuclear physics and the laws of conservation of energy and mass to make her calculations.

2. What factors did Meitner take into consideration when calculating the amount of energy lost?

Meitner considered the mass of the nuclei involved, the binding energy of the nuclei, and the energy released by the splitting of the nuclei. She also took into account any residual energy that was not released during the fission process.

3. Did Meitner's calculations accurately predict the amount of energy lost during nuclear fission?

Yes, Meitner's calculations were very accurate and her results were in line with experimental data. Her calculations were crucial in understanding the vast amount of energy that can be released through nuclear fission.

4. How did Meitner's calculations contribute to the development of nuclear energy?

Meitner's calculations helped scientists understand the potential of nuclear energy and its potential uses. Her work laid the foundation for further research and development in the field of nuclear energy, leading to its use in power generation, medicine, and other industries.

5. Can Meitner's calculations be applied to other forms of energy production?

While Meitner's calculations were specifically for nuclear fission, her use of fundamental physics principles and equations can be applied to other forms of energy production. Her work serves as a reminder of the important role that science and mathematics play in understanding and harnessing energy in our world.

Similar threads

B Traffic Turbines - Free Energy or Cost Exchange?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Explaining Existence: Can We Convert Energy to Matter?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
13
Views
2K
B What is binding energy and how does it hold nuclei together?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
2K
I How can I calculate the energy of a body of mass?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
936
B I am trying to understand energy, and its relation to (matte
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Rest energies of individual nucleons considered in isolation
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Energy Lost During Purely Inelastic Collisions
    • Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Nuclear fission calculation of energy released
    • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Assistance finding the nuclear energy difference during nuclear fusion
    • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
920
I've been feeling lost as of late.
    • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
878

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top