How Did Saturn's 2010 Storm Impact Its Atmosphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Saturn Storm
AI Thread Summary
A significant storm on Saturn, first detected in December 2010, has been found to be more intense than initially believed, with a massive ethylene volume approximately 100 times higher than expected. NASA's Cassini spacecraft observed a dramatic temperature increase of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (66 degrees Celsius) in Saturn's stratosphere due to the storm. This storm, which originated around 33 degrees north latitude, created a large vortex and exhibited extreme thunder and lightning activity. The storm maintained its intensity for an extended period, with its updraft capable of displacing the entire volume of Earth's atmosphere in just 150 days. The findings highlight the storm's unprecedented scale and impact on Saturn's atmospheric dynamics.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
A large storm has been studied since December 2010.

New research indicates the storm is stronger than first thought. Associated with the storm is a huge volume of ethylene, with an amount roughly 100 times through possible on Saturn. The source of the ethylene is unknown.

Observations by NASA's Cassini spacecraft — which first detected the tempest in December 2010 — show that the enormous Saturn storm sent temperatures in the planet's stratosphere soaring 150 degrees Fahrenheit (66 degrees Celsius) above normal, according to a new study.

"This temperature spike is so extreme it's almost unbelievable, especially in this part of Saturn's atmosphere, which typically is very stable," study lead author Brigette Hesman, of the University of Maryland and NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., said in a statement.

. . . .

NASA's Cassini Sees Burp at Saturn After Large Storm
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2012-335

http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMLPIMFL8H_index_0.html
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
NASA's Cassini Watches Storm Choke on Its Own Tail - 01.31.13
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/cassini/whycassini/cassini20130131.html

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2013-040#2

Earth's hurricanes feed off the energy of warm water and leave a cold-water wake. This storm in Saturn's northern hemisphere also feasted off warm "air" in the gas giant's atmosphere. The storm, first detected on Dec. 5, 2010, and tracked by Cassini's radio and plasma wave subsystem and imaging cameras, erupted around 33 degrees north latitude. Shortly after the bright, turbulent head of the storm emerged and started moving west, it spawned a clockwise-spinning vortex that drifted much more slowly. Within months, the storm wrapped around the planet at that latitude, stretching about 190,000 miles (300,000 kilometers) in circumference, thundering and throwing lightning along the way.
. . . .
"This thunder-and-lightning storm on Saturn was a beast," said Kunio Sayanagi, the paper's lead author and a Cassini imaging team associate at Hampton University in Virginia. "The storm maintained its intensity for an unusually long time. The storm head itself thrashed for 201 days, and its updraft erupted with an intensity that would have sucked out the entire volume of Earth's atmosphere in 150 days. And it also created the largest vortex ever observed in the troposphere of Saturn, expanding up to 7,500 miles [12,000 kilometers] across."
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top