How Did the Moon Achieve Orbit Without an Orbital Burn?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oldfart
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how the Moon achieved its orbit after being formed from debris resulting from a Mars-sized body colliding with Earth. It questions the necessity of an orbital burn for the debris to enter orbit, given that traditional understanding suggests a separate rocket burn is required for objects to achieve stable orbits. One theory posits that the Earth's non-spherical shape immediately after the impact allowed debris to be captured into orbit without an additional burn. Additionally, the conversation touches on the giant impactor hypothesis and alternative theories, such as the capture theory, while noting the Moon's unique chemical composition as evidence of its distinct history. The complexities of these theories highlight the ongoing debate in planetary science regarding the Moon's formation.
Oldfart
Messages
195
Reaction score
1
I've read on PF that you can't shoot something, like from a big gun, into Earth orbit; it will either fall back to Earth or attain escape velocity and be gone forever. Instead, you need a separate rocket burn to insert the object into orbit following launch. Makes good sense to me.

So we are told that our moon was the end result of a Mars-size body crashing into the Earth. The artist's rendition of this event always shows a big SPLAT, with collision debris showered up into space, and it's explained that a fair amount of this debris eventually collected to form our moon.

OK, it visually looks like this debris was effectively "shot" into space by the force of the impact, but where is the orbital burn? How did it get inserted into Earth orbit? What am I missing here?

Confused in Virginia, OF
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'll take a guess. Earth was far from spherical immediately after the big splat, so the rules of the game change a bit. Any material blasted off the lobes of an elongated Earth would not need an apogee kick as Earth returns to its spherical shape.
 
That is a pretty fair guess, Tony. The giant impactor hypothesis has problems. It is merely the best among current models. I lean towards the capture thing, although it invokes certain improbabilities to work. The most compelling evidence, IMO, is iron oxide abundance. The iron oxide abundance of the moon fits nicely between those of Mars and earth. That, along with other chemical signatures, suggests our moon has a unique history.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top