Biology How did they measure total cells? (genetics of bacteria)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the methodology for measuring total cell counts and His+ revertant colonies in bacterial mutagenesis experiments. Participants express confusion about how to derive the number of 10^7 survivors from initial cell counts, suggesting a starting point of approximately 1*10^14 cells that are mutagenized and then diluted. They emphasize the importance of using survival plates to determine total survivors and the need for proper dilutions to ensure countable colony numbers. The conversation highlights that replica plating may not be necessary for measuring small frequencies of mutants, as dilutions can provide clearer results. Overall, the participants seek clarity on experimental design and data interpretation in the context of bacterial genetics.
outxbreak
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
1. About how many cells were plated to count His+ revertant colonies?
How was total cell number determined?




vrf3gk.jpg




I know that the mutation freq was out of 10^7 survivors. So they had to measure the total cell number and come up with 10^7 survivors? But I'm not sure how they got this exact number of 10^7 survivors?

Then to measure His+ revertants I would think they need to plate the same concentration of cells as they did to measure the total cell count?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer the second part of the question first, and that should also lead to the answer to the first.

Imagine yourself doing the experiment - what do you actually do in order to get results?
 
Last edited:
Hmm well replica plate from the survival plate (his+ min + glu) onto another plate (-his +min +glu)

But I'm really confused as to how every time point had a survival plate with 10^7 survivors? I guess they started with something like 1*1014 cells and mutagenized them with UV... so is the y-axis saying if the survival plate has 10^14 survivors and the mutant plate has 5 mutants then to find the number of actual mutants that you plot set up:

5 mutants/ 10^14 survivors= x mutants/10^7 survivors
x=5*10^-7 mutants per 10^7 survivors..?
 
outxbreak said:
Hmm well replica plate from the survival plate (his+ min + glu) onto another plate (-his +min +glu)

But I'm really confused as to how every time point had a survival plate with 10^7 survivors? I guess they started with something like 1*1014 cells and mutagenized them with UV... so is the y-axis saying if the survival plate has 10^14 survivors and the mutant plate has 5 mutants then to find the number of actual mutants that you plot set up:

5 mutants/ 10^14 survivors= x mutants/10^7 survivors
x=5*10^-7 mutants per 10^7 survivors..?

Your questions come with very little context; fortunately these are very common types of experiment for mutagenesis etc. so we can reasonably guess.

You ask about time points. There are no time points in what you have told us. There is a sketch without experimental points of a graph of slightly processed or calculated numbers showing the frequency in the population of revertants from auxotrophy (i.e. his+) as function of uv dose. This is how such data would normally be presented except there would be experimental points.

Survivors and revertants are measured by the number of colonies you get on a plate, which you can count. You don't, and you don't need to, measure every cell in this way - it would take a long time to count 1014 colonies. You typically aim to have of the order of 100 colonies per plate.

So you have to arrange the experiment to have reasonably countable numbers of colonies for the various conditions. You have the advantage of knowing some expected numbers. (When you don't know beforehand what the numbers are, how are you going to do that?)

Are doing this stuff with no laboratory practice? It sounds like either that or you are not connecting these things up with the lab work.

I think replica platings are not needed and do you no good in this case when you are looking for small frequencies. You do everything by dilutions!
 
Last edited:
She gave us no other context. :/

In order to measure total survival don't you need to have a survival plate (min+his) and then replica plate these survivors onto the mutant plate (min-his). This ensures that the mutants came from those survivors.

I'm still not sure the total cells to start with.
I would guess 1*1014 cells in a tube.
Mutagenize the cells in this tube with UV dose.
Then plate onto survival plate after a 100,000 fold dilution. If you get 100 cells it means you had 1*107 survivors/109 cells.. I don't know any other way to get 10^7 survivors.
 
outxbreak said:
She gave us no other context. :/

In order to measure total survival don't you need to have a survival plate (min+his) and then replica plate these survivors onto the mutant plate (min-his). This ensures that the mutants came from those survivors.
where else can they come from but survivors?
To know the number of survivors, yes you have to plate on min + his.
According to the sketch about 10-5 of his+ revertants not requiring histidine to form colonies are being easily measured.
I think it is obvious that whatever the volumes etc., to see a convenient number of these, you need to dilute them 10-5 less than you do to measure total survivors.
If you measured by replica plating you would have to look at 105 p!ates to see one colony - there is no point in it




outxbreak said:
I'm still not sure the total cells to start with.
I would guess 1*1014 cells in a tube.
Mutagenize the cells in this tube with UV dose.
Then plate onto survival plate after a 100,000 fold dilution. If you get 100 cells it means you had 1*107 survivors/109 cells.. I don't know any other way to get 10^7 survivors.
right
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top