How Do Acids and Bases Ionize in Aqueous Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Acids and bases ionize in aqueous solutions through specific reactions. HI ionizes to form H+ and I- ions in water. The reaction between H2SO4 and LiOH produces water and LiHSO4. For the weak base X-, the ionization can be represented as X- + H2O yielding OH- and HX. The oxide ion (O2-) acts as a strong base, reacting with H2PO4- to produce OH- and HPO4-2. Understanding these ionization processes is crucial for studying acid-base chemistry.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1) Show how each of the following acids ionize in aqueous solution. HI

2)Write the reaction between H2SO4 and LiOH

3)Write ionization equation of X-, a weak base

4) Write an equation showing the oxide ion acting as a strong base

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


1) for this it duznt state water is involved, so do you just do HI -> H+ + I- and both of them are aqueous?

2)H2S04 + LiOH -> H20 + LiHSO4 (all are aqueous except water)

3) No idea. I put X- + H2O -> OH- + HX but it duznt say it's reacting with anything?

4) O2- + H2PO4- -> OH- + HPO4-2 (all aqueous)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aqueous solution means it's in water.
 
H2SO4 + LiOH -> H20 + Li2SO4

That should be right..just have to balance now.
 
Last edited:
t!m said:
Aqueous solution means it's in water.

i know.....
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top