How Do Atoms of Element Q Absorb or Emit Specific Photon Frequencies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter steven10137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra
AI Thread Summary
Atoms of element Q can absorb or emit specific photon frequencies due to their discrete energy levels, which correspond to the energies of the photons. The frequencies of 6.40E14 Hz and 9.05E14 Hz indicate transitions between these energy levels, specifically from n=2 to n=1 and n=3 to n=1, respectively. The longest wavelength photon emitted corresponds to the smallest frequency difference, calculated as 3.01E14 Hz, leading to a wavelength of approximately 9.97E-7 m. The discussion emphasizes that transitions between energy levels dictate the absorption and emission of photons, with certain transitions being more likely than others. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing atomic behavior in relation to photon interactions.
steven10137
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An atom of element Q can only absorb two photons of frequency 6.40E14 Hz and 9.05E14 Hz.

Explain how atoms of element Q could absorb or emit photons of particular frequencies.2. The attempt at a solution

OK I think I am missing something in my understanding of absorbtion and emission ...
I don't really understand what the question is asking.

But, perhaps;

The element Q has set energy levels; n=1, n=2 ...
Hence the element can only absorb or emit photons with energies equal to the energies of these energy levels.
These energies are 6.40E14 Hz and 9.05E14 respectively.As I said, I'm having trouble. If someone could please explain the concept of the problem, it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Steven
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Astronuc, thanks for your reply :)

For the second part of the question,
I am required to draw the energy level diagram of the element, showing the known levels.
Then, calculate the longest wavelength photon that the element could emit.

http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/9219/photondiagramkd9.jpg

ok so the longest possible photon will be that of the smallest frequency photon.
From the question, it says the element can absorb photons of the the specifc frequencies.

Now from here
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod5.html#c2
I can see that the downward transition gives an emission of E2 - E1.

So we are looking for the downward transition with the smallest possible frequency, which is;
9.05E14 - 6.04E14 = 3.01E14 Hz
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \lambda = \frac{c}{f} \\ <br /> \lambda _{\max } = \frac{{3 \times 10^8 }}{{3.01 \times 10^{14} }} = 9.97 \times 10^{ - 7} m \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

How am I looking?

Thanks for your help,
Steven
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The energy level at n=2 is closer to n=1 than n=3 is to n=2.

Refer to the last link I cited -
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hyde.html

If 9.05E14 Hz represents n=3 to n=1 and 6.04E14 n=2 to n=1, then the n=3 to n=2 transition would be the difference. This is based on the statement "An atom of element Q can only absorb two photons of frequency 6.40E14 Hz and 9.05E14 Hz." It would be unlikely that a photon would absorbed by an electron in the excited n=2 state.

So we are looking for the downward transition with the smallest possible frequency, which is;
9.05E14 - 6.04E14 = 3.01E14 Hz
Looks OK.
 
OK for the diagram, the 2.5eV should be less than the 3.75eV (elementary mistake)

Astronuc said:
If 9.05E14 Hz represents n=3 to n=1 and 6.04E14 n=2 to n=1, then the n=3 to n=2 transition would be the difference. This is based on the statement "An atom of element Q can only absorb two photons of frequency 6.40E14 Hz and 9.05E14 Hz." It would be unlikely that a photon would absorbed by an electron in the excited n=2 state.

I'm not really fully understanding what you mean.
But are you trying to say that those frequencies do not represent those transitions?
Am I sort of on the right track?

Thanks for your patience.
Steven.
 
Note the different groups and emission lines in this -
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hyde.html#c4


I was saying those energies do represent those transitions.

The two absorption energy would correspond to n=3 to n=1 (more energetic) and n=2 to n=1 less energetic, and these would be approximately equal to emission lines. There is also a possible n=3 to n=2 emission, which is the difference between 3-1 and 2-1.

The 2->3 would be an unlikely absorption because the transition 2->1 would occur very quickly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top