How do baryons transform under chiral transformations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrea M.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryon Lagrangian
Andrea M.
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to understand how to construct effective lagrangians for the hadrons. I understand the procedure for the mesons but I get stuck on baryons. In particular I don't understand how the baryons should transform under a chiral transformation. I mean for the mesons it was easy because they could be interpreted as the Goldston bosons of the theory, but for baryons?

Thanks in advance for the answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you working from a specific reference? In the linear sigma model, for example, the nucleon is introduced as a Dirac spinor. The chiral symmetry is manifest as ##SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R##, where the factors act independently on the chiral components of the spinor.
 
I'd like to understand how the octet of baryons ##B## transforms under ##SU(3)_L\times SU(3)_R##. The only thing I know is that it must transforms as the eight dimensional representation of the unbroken symmetry ##SU(3)_V## but I don't get why it should transform like
$$
B\to h(\phi,g)Bh^{\dagger}(\phi,g)
$$
where ##\phi## are Goldstone bosons fields, ##g## is a ##SU(3)_L\times SU(3)_R## transformation and ##h## is a ##SU(3)_V## transformation as claimed for example in Pich, A. & de Rafael, E., 1991. Strong CP violation in an effective chiral Lagrangian approach. Nucl. Phys., B367(2), pp.313–333.
 
I am not that familiar with specific nonlinear realizations, but there is a draft version of Georgi's book available at www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hgeorgi/weak.pdf. This representation is discussed in Ch. 6, but you will need to refer to the discussion of mesons in Ch. 5 to figure out the notation.
 
  • Like
Likes Andrea M.
Yes I've already read this but I still have some doubts, I will give him another chance.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top