How do cats defy physics with their perfect landings?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of cats landing on their feet after falling, exploring the underlying physics, particularly angular momentum and body mechanics. Participants examine various hypotheses regarding how cats achieve this feat, including the role of flexibility, body movement, and the tail, while also referencing personal experiments and analogies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that cats manipulate their angular velocity by distorting their body in response to their angular momentum during a fall.
  • Another participant notes that cats can create torque using their muscles to control their limbs in a gravitational field.
  • Some participants draw parallels to human movements on a turntable or in water to illustrate similar principles of rotation and balance.
  • Several participants emphasize the flexibility of cats, proposing that they can twist their bodies to orient themselves correctly before landing.
  • There is a suggestion that the tail may play a role in the cat's ability to land on its feet, though others argue its significance is minimal.
  • One participant proposes a hypothetical experiment involving duct-taping a cat's tail to assess its effect on landing.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of the tail, suggesting that cats can still right themselves without it, albeit potentially less effectively.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the initial claims and the validity of the experiments conducted.
  • A later reply challenges the analogy of human movements, arguing that the absence of static friction in mid-air makes the situation different from those examples.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanisms by which cats land on their feet, with multiple competing views and hypotheses presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about the physical properties of cats and the conditions of the fall, which remain unresolved. The discussion also includes references to personal experiments that may not adhere to rigorous scientific standards.

  • #31
cepheid said:
I have no idea what the "non-integrability" of a "non-holonomic" constraint is. The only thing I got out of it was the first sentence, that it is apparently possible for something to rotate while maintaining zero angular momentum, by deforming.

And it is. A fairly easy thought experiment is to replace the cat with a rather plump and metamorphosing sausage. Draw a line down one side of the sausage then divide it into 4 equal sections, one through four. Think of this as a transformer sausage. The sections can move around as long as they only push and pull one one another. No outside agents are allowed to exert any forces on the sections in this experiment.

Displace section one radially from section two. Section two and three stay attached to each other. Section four is displaced in the same direction as segment one.

Now it's best to use the symmetry of the system and just look at two sections at a time. Sections one and two have their axis separated by some rigid rod. A chain drive or belt connects the two. Now a means can be supplied to spin the two with respect to the rod without external forces or energy.

To conserve angular momentum the two segments, or disks, will need to orbit about each other. Also, important to note, the angular displacements of the line drawn on the original sausage, and now appearing on each section remains the same on each section. We can't allow one segment to turn faster than the other.

As the sections are brought back into alignment, after some number of revolutions, the line drawn down the side is displaced.

So the cat thing is reduced to two sprockets and chain, a separating rod, and some means of propulsion.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Come to think of it, it might be fairly easy to demonstrate in a classroom, properly suspended on a string with something available from Toys R Us.
 
  • #33
Drakkith said:
I think most people aren't thinking about something that can move its own parts, which your standard physics class probably doesn't go over when they talk about angular momentum.

The nature of an object's construction doesn't determine whether or not angular momentum is conserved. No explanation of how a cat works can do without the basic conservation laws.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K