How Do Complex Numbers Affect Trigonometric and Quantum Mechanical Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wishbone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
Wishbone
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
the first one says:

Prove that:
a) [tex]|sin z | \geq |sin x|[/tex]
b) [tex]|cos z | \geq |cos x|[/tex]Where I guess z = x+iy...

What I have done:
Well I am pretty stumped on this one, I have though about expanding sin z into [tex](sin x) (cosh y) + (i cos x) (sinh y)[/tex]. I don't think that helps me prove anything, but it seems like more terms means it would be greater than just a sin x :rolleyes:

Second problemo:

We see the anuglar momentum components
[tex](L_x - i L_y) != (L_x +iL_y)*[/tex]Gosh I've tried a lot on this one, I really don't know too too much about QM, so its been tough. It just seems to go against the definition of a conjugate, so I dunno...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First:

I don't think that helps me prove anything

Think a little harder! :)

HINT: What is the absolute value of the expression?

Second: What exactly does that exclamation point mean?
 
oh i didnt know how to put the does not equal to sign, so I put the !=.
 
Tide said:
HINT: What is the absolute value of the expression?

hmmmm well of course I know |z| = [tex]\sqrt{x^2 +y^2}[/tex]

so would |sin z| = [tex]\sqrt{(sin x)^2 (cosh y)^2 + (i cos x)^2 (sinh y)^2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
hmm ok so I get[tex](sin^2 x) (cosh^2y) + (cos^2 x) (sinh^2 y)[/tex]

but that gives me [tex]|sin z|^2[/tex], and then hmm, I need to take the sqaure root of that to get get back to |sin z|?
 
Wishbone said:
hmm ok so I get[tex](sin^2 x) (cosh^2y) + (cos^2 x) (sinh^2 y)[/tex]

but that gives me [tex]|sin z|^2[/tex], and then hmm, I need to take the sqaure root of that to get get back to |sin z|?

I think you'll find the identity [itex]\cos^2(x)=1-\sin^2(x)[/itex] quite helpful in finishing this off.

As for the QM question I think what they're driving at here is that you don't take the complex conjugate of operators. Instead you take the Hermitian conjugate. That means that [itex]L_x-iL_y=(L_x+iL_y)^{\dagger}[/itex].

And by the way the not-equal-to symbol is given by [itex]\neq[/itex] (click the image to see the code).