How Do Conditional Probabilities Affect Ralph's Decision to Use an Umbrella?

  • Thread starter Thread starter confusedonpro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Probability
AI Thread Summary
Ralph is trying to determine whether to use an umbrella based on Laura's umbrella usage patterns. Laura uses an umbrella 70% of the time, and Ralph's decisions depend on her actions: if Laura uses one, Ralph uses it 25% of the time; if she does not, he uses it 50% of the time. The discussion revolves around calculating the conditional probabilities for Ralph's decisions based on Laura's behavior. The initial calculations for the probabilities were 15% for Ralph using an umbrella given Laura does not, and 35% for the overall probability that Ralph will use an umbrella, but there is uncertainty about their correctness. Clarification on these probabilities is sought to ensure accurate understanding.
confusedonpro
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

New here and doing some random probability questions in prep for the GRE. I found one and I know it is simple, but I am stumped, and there is no answer online. Here it is--any help is much appreciated.

Ralph is considering whether to use an umbrella. Previously, Ralph's friend Laura had used an umbrella 70% of the time. If Laura does not use an umbrella, the probability that Ralph will use an umbrella is .50. If Laura does use an umbrella, the probability that Ralph uses an umbrella is .25.

a) If Ralph uses an umbrella, what is the probability that Laura did not use an umbrella?
b)What is the probability that Ralph will use an umbrella?

Thanks so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So this first thing I notice is that whether or not ralph uses an umbrella, laura uses one70% of the time. So when they say if ralph uses an umbrella what is the probability that laura doesn't, that's the same question as, what is the probability that laura does not use an umbrella.

Then the next question is what ist he probability that ralph will use an umbrella. So what you want to do here is split it up into cases.

Case 1: 70% of the time laura uses one, and out of the 70% of times that laura uses one, ralph uses one 50% of the time.

Case 2: 30% of the time laura does not use one, out of that 30%, ralph uses an umbrella 25% of the time. if you have any questions feel free to ask .
 
confusedonpro said:
Hello everyone

New here and doing some random probability questions in prep for the GRE. I found one and I know it is simple, but I am stumped, and there is no answer online. Here it is--any help is much appreciated.

Ralph is considering whether to use an umbrella. Previously, Ralph's friend Laura had used an umbrella 70% of the time. If Laura does not use an umbrella, the probability that Ralph will use an umbrella is .50. If Laura does use an umbrella, the probability that Ralph uses an umbrella is .25.

a) If Ralph uses an umbrella, what is the probability that Laura did not use an umbrella?
b)What is the probability that Ralph will use an umbrella?

Thanks so much in advance.


Looks like I posted in the wrong forum. Woops. Sorry. Please delete.
 
dacruick said:
So this first thing I notice is that whether or not ralph uses an umbrella, laura uses one70% of the time. So when they say if ralph uses an umbrella what is the probability that laura doesn't, that's the same question as, what is the probability that laura does not use an umbrella.

Then the next question is what ist he probability that ralph will use an umbrella. So what you want to do here is split it up into cases.

Case 1: 70% of the time laura uses one, and out of the 70% of times that laura uses one, ralph uses one 50% of the time.

Case 2: 30% of the time laura does not use one, out of that 30%, ralph uses an umbrella 25% of the time. if you have any questions feel free to ask .


Thanks for that info. I guess I am still confused regarding the actual answers to A and B. For A, I get 15% (.5 * .3). For B, I get .35. However, I just KNOW I am wrong.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top