How Do Cube Root Numbers Relate to the Fraction 1/8 in Determining Pitch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PH7SICS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pitch Spheres
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between cube root numbers and the fraction of 1/8 in the context of sound pitch produced by spherical objects. It is established that doubling the diameter of a sphere increases its volume by eightfold, which correlates to a pitch that is double the original. The connection between 1/8 and cube roots is clarified, noting that the cube root of a volume relates to the radius, where doubling the radius indeed multiplies the volume by 8. The conversation also extends to other shapes, such as drumheads, where pitch changes according to different mathematical principles. Ultimately, the relationship between volume, radius, and pitch is simpler than initially perceived, highlighting the importance of understanding basic geometric principles.
PH7SICS
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Dose anyone know the relationship of cube root numbers and the fraction of 1/8

"Assuming a body of a size represented by X has a pitch of 1024 per second, then a pitch of 2048 (double 1024) per second will be produced by a body having a volume of some mean between 1/8 of X and the cube root of X"

I understand why a pitch double the original will be produced by a sphere 1/8 the volume because if you double the diameter of a sphere you increase its volume by eightfold.

I don't however understand the relationship between 1/8 and cube root numbers, any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The pitch depends on the radius of the sphere. Doubling the radius multiplies the volume by
2^3=8.
 
Is it as simple as that...haha lol, I knew 2^3 was 8 but I had assumed I was looking for something more complex, funny when you look for the complex you miss the simple.

Would this only work for spheres then?
 
It would also work for the frequencies of a 3D object. For a drumhead, the pitch would go like 2^2.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top