How do EM waves transfer energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mechanisms of energy transfer through electromagnetic (EM) waves, particularly in the context of radio waves and their practical applications. Participants explore both classical and quantum perspectives, addressing how energy propagates through different mediums and the implications of obstacles in transmission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how energy is transferred by EM waves in a vacuum, questioning the practical implications of this transfer.
  • Another participant explains that in classical electrodynamics, energy is propagated by time-varying electric and magnetic fields, which do not require a medium, while in quantum electrodynamics, photons are the carriers of energy.
  • A participant raises a practical scenario regarding radio communication, asking if the receiving antenna experiences the field from a distant transmitting antenna and how obstacles affect transmission.
  • One response uses an analogy of a frisbee to illustrate how obstacles can block the propagation of photons, similar to how a frisbee can be intercepted by players.
  • Another participant clarifies that the interaction between antennas involves wave propagation rather than simple induction, suggesting that defining 'medium' becomes complex at fundamental levels.
  • Further elaboration indicates that EM waves can be reflected, absorbed, or scattered, which can hinder their transmission from one point to another.
  • A participant suggests a thought experiment comparing the visibility of light from a bulb versus sunlight to illustrate energy transfer, noting that additional experiments are needed to observe the wave nature of EM waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanisms of energy transfer and the effects of obstacles, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the complexities of defining mediums or the nuances of wave propagation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding related to the definitions of terms like 'medium' and the complexities of energy transfer mechanisms, which remain unresolved.

dayan83
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have some basic doubts regarding how the energy is transferred (e.g. transmission of radio waves) as EM waves. As I know, the wave is not anything that can be practically seen in the space, but it is a model that we use to describe how energy is transferred. But if we think practically, how does actually the energy transfer through vacuum or a medium? In vacuum, as there's nothing inside, how does the energy transfer? I've read about 'radiation', but what is actually used for the energy transfer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In classical electrodynamics, nothing propagates the energy but the fields. The energy is stored in the time-varying electric and magnetic fields which are self-supportive and thus do not need a medium to propagate. The fields can give up their energy, among many ways, by exciting currents in a conducting medium. They can also create vibrations in polar molecules that create heat.

In quantum electrodynamics, the energy is propagated by photons, energy/momentum packets.
 
Thanks for the explanation..But I have some more doubts.

If we think of a practical application of a radio communication link of 10km, does the receiving antenna directly experience the field which is created by the transmitting antenna 10kms away? Is it what then induces a current in the receiving antenna? If a medium is not required to create a field, why would some links fail if there are obstacles in between?

Tks!
 
Why would some links fail if there are obstacles in between? Think of it this way: Why playing ultimate frisbee, why does the frisbee not get your team mate when the other team is in the way? It's because they're in the way :)

Probably the best way to think of this is with the frisbee analogy, one person (antennae) is throwing the frisbee (photons, conveying the E/M forces) to the other person. The photons can be blocked just like a frisbee can.
 
dayan83 said:
Thanks for the explanation..But I have some more doubts.

If we think of a practical application of a radio communication link of 10km, does the receiving antenna directly experience the field which is created by the transmitting antenna 10kms away? Is it what then induces a current in the receiving antenna? If a medium is not required to create a field, why would some links fail if there are obstacles in between?

Tks!
it isn't simple induction. the first antenna creates a wave which propagates to the second antenna. if the second antenna was in the near field of the first antenna then it would be simple induction

define 'medium'. when you get to the fundamental limits of existence itself its not so easy to define.
 
PiratePhysicist said:
Probably the best way to think of this is with the frisbee analogy, one person (antennae) is throwing the frisbee (photons, conveying the E/M forces) to the other person. The photons can be blocked just like a frisbee can.

More formally, EM waves may sometimes be reflected, absorbed, and/or scattered. These phenomena may prohibit a wave from traversing from point A to point B. If you have any doubts of the energy transfer, go inside your house and look at a light bulb after you turn it on. Then go outside and look at the sun. Which can you look at for a longer period of time? (Note: I do not suggest you actually do this experiment; it should suffice to simply hypothesize the results).

Also note that (referring to the second sentence of the original post), in a manner of speaking, the experiment I described allows you to "see" EM waves (although it takes some additional, clever experiments to actually see the "wave nature").
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
929
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K