How do forces of the tires contribute to car rollovers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of car rollovers, particularly the role of tire friction and the vehicle's center of gravity. Higher tire friction does not decrease rollover risk; instead, it can increase the likelihood of rolling by providing more force that can lead to torque sufficient to lift the center of gravity. A vehicle's center of gravity and track width are critical factors; a lower center of gravity and wider track require more torque to initiate a rollover. The relationship between tire friction and vehicle control is emphasized, as increased friction aids in turning and stopping. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing strategies to prevent car rollovers.
jtliu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the physics of car rollovers and perhaps what can prevent them in terms of the forces that are involved. According to various diagrams I've seen, there is friction applied by the tires (with some diagrams showing a set of forces acting only on a single tire which provides an axis of rotation for the case of a car rollover).

If there were a higher amount of friction provided by the tires, would this decrease the amount of rotation/decrease the chances of a car rolling over? If the tires applied a greater amount of friction, would this adversely affect the turning of the car itself? Also, is there any relationship between the car's center of gravity and the forces on the tires that contribute to the car rolling over (I guess maybe the torque itself?)?

Any insight into these questions would be greatly, greatly appreciated! I'm trying to work on a project that involves the physics of car rollovers so I'd really like to understand them more to see if my project can possibly lead to some sort of aid in preventing car rollovers... but that involves understanding the fundamental physics of them first and if there is even any relationship between what I'm looking at.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jtliu said:
Any insight into these questions would be greatly, greatly appreciated! I'm trying to work on a project that involves the physics of car rollovers so I'd really like to understand them more to see if my project can possibly lead to some sort of aid in preventing car rollovers... but that involves understanding the fundamental physics of them first and if there is even any relationship between what I'm looking at.

well i was also looking at those specific conditions for 'rollovers of vehicles' i.e analysis of accidents - you might have seen the following and if not kindly do visit-
< https://www.accidentreconstruction.com/research/suv/rollovers[1].pdf>
then one can discuss the details of role of lateral acceleration and g on the cars.
 
jtliu said:
If there were a higher amount of friction provided by the tires, would this decrease the amount of rotation/decrease the chances of a car rolling over?
No. Quite the opposite. Consider the extreme case of a car on smooth ice. It's tires have very little friction with the surface. If you apply a lateral force to that car it will slide rather then roll.

jtliu said:
If the tires applied a greater amount of friction, would this adversely affect the turning of the car itself?
No. Quite the opposite. Greater friction means that the tires can apply a greater force to the car. It is this force that makes the car turn, accelerate, or stop.

jtliu said:
Also, is there any relationship between the car's center of gravity and the forces on the tires that contribute to the car rolling over (I guess maybe the torque itself?)?
In order for a car to roll, there must be a torque on the car that is sufficient to raise it's center of gravity to the point where it would be balanced over 2 wheels. So, the lower the center of gravity, and the wider the track width of the vehicle, the more torque is required. This torque originates from the friction force of the tires against the road. On a sports car like a Corvette, the center of gravity is so low and the track is so wide, that the tires can never (in normal circumstances) produce enough friction to raise the it up high enough to roll over.

So, in summary...
Low center of gravity and a wide track make a vehicle harder to roll.
High friction tires give you more force with which you can roll it, but, that same force is what you need to control the car, so it's not something you'd typically want to deliberately reduce.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top