How Do Function Transformations Work?

WannabeFeynman
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello all, I need some help to clear my doubts.

Why does a horizontal translation (f(x + c)) move to the left if c is positive?

Can someone graphically explain what effect a stretch and compression (vertical and horizontal) has on the original parent function?

Similar to the first question, why does f(ax) actually stretch by a factor of 1/a instead of a?

Thanks, I might have more questions later.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is you graph y1=f(x) and y2=f(x+C) and then compare them, whatever "y1" you see at any "x1" will be seen to the left (assuming C>0) at x2="x1-C" for y2 because y2 = f(x2+C) = f(x1-C+C) = f(x1) = y1.
Similarly:
f(Ax) will horizontally thin the graph by a factor of "A" (or stretch it by 1/A)
Af(x) will vertically stretch the graph by a factor of "A".
 
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
 
Seydlitz said:
Take a look at this simple example, suppose ##f(x)=x##, a simple straight line through the origin. If ##x=0##, then ##f(x)=0## as well. But if you take ##f(x+a)##, the origin will be at ##-a##. If you draw the line, the origin will move to the left because the origin is now in negative part of the x-axis.
The origin doesn't move around, but the x-intercept does.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top