How do genes regulate cell abilities?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattius_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genes
AI Thread Summary
Genes, as sequences of DNA, dictate the sequence of amino acids in proteins, which in turn determine the proteins' shape and function. The process begins with transcription, where DNA is read to produce mRNA, followed by translation, where mRNA is converted into proteins. These proteins serve various roles in the cell, including enzymes, transcription factors, and receptors, facilitating cellular functions and adaptations. The discussion highlights that the expression of specific genes through transcription and translation varies among different cell types, influencing their capabilities. For instance, lens cells focus light by producing crystallin proteins, while blood cells synthesize hemoglobin. It is emphasized that it is not the genes themselves that dictate cellular functions, but rather the transcription of specific genes influenced by external factors, such as surrounding connective tissue, that determines a cell's abilities and functions.
Mattius_
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What chemical reactions take place when genes "tell" cells what to do? I'll have more specific questions later but this will be a decent start.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
A gene is a sequence of DNA, a protein is a sequence of amino acids. The sequence of the first determines the sequence of the second.

The sequence of amino acids determines the protein's shape and function. Some are colors in your iris, some are hormones, some are enzymes which favor certain reactions.
 
Genes are like a book of words, each word has a different meaning. But each word need to be processed in order to become active.

Genes are read by certain cellular machineries, this process is called transcription: DNA is read and an mRNA copy (this is a messenger molecule) is made. Then after transcription, translation takes place. This is the process where the mRNA is translated into a protein.

Proteins have very specific functions in a cell, they can be enzymes, transcription factors, receptors, etc.
 
and these proteins are the actual muscle that make commands into actual transformations/adaptations? Or are they another form of a messenger?
 
Mattius_ said:
and these proteins are the actual muscle that make commands into actual transformations/adaptations? Or are they another form of a messenger?

It stops there. Proteins help make up most of the human body
Once you go protein you can't go back. :wink:
 
There's also differential transcription and translation in some cells versus others. For example, the lens cell in the eye contains thousands of crystallin proteins which serve to focus light (I think). In the growing lens cells, there would be very high amounts of transcription of the crystallin message, and translation of the protein.

In contrast, blood cells would not have transcription and translation of crystallin, but instead have transcription and translation of haemoglobin.

In my opinion, it is not genes that "tell" what cells can do. Instead, it is the transcription of certain genes that limit the abilities of the cell. There are many things that determine what a cell's ability should be, and should include, for example inducing factors from the surrounding connective tissue. Theoretically, if a cell were to be located in some other place of the body, it would change its transcription activities accordingly to what its new destined function is.

K.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top