How do gravitational waves transfer angular momentum in general relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kmarinas86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transfer of angular momentum through gravitational waves in the context of general relativity (GR). Participants explore the implications of light and photon pressure on angular momentum, particularly in relation to celestial bodies like asteroids and the effects of sunlight. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, conceptual clarifications, and some experimental references.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that light can transfer angular momentum, citing examples like sunlight affecting the spin of asteroids.
  • Others argue that the effect of photon pressure on asteroids may be minimal, suggesting that heating and subsequent infrared radiation emission are more significant factors in their movement.
  • One participant questions the definition of angular momentum in the context of GR, suggesting that if photons do not contribute to the center of mass, they cannot apply torque or transfer angular momentum as traditionally understood.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of angular momentum being relative to a specific point, using the sun as a reference for discussing the angular momentum of photons and asteroids.
  • There is mention of the Yarkovsky effect, which explains how sunlight indirectly influences asteroid movement through thermal radiation rather than direct force.
  • One participant references a source discussing gravitational waves and angular momentum exchange, emphasizing a non-local definition that integrates effects over a sphere encompassing mass.
  • Discussion includes a reference to the Crookes Radiometer and its misinterpretations regarding photon pressure, highlighting the complexity of explaining such phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms by which light and gravitational waves may transfer angular momentum. There is no consensus on the implications of these mechanisms within the framework of general relativity, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and effects of angular momentum in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the transfer of angular momentum, particularly regarding the definitions of torque and force in GR. There are unresolved questions about the local versus non-local effects of gravitational waves and the assumptions underlying the discussion of photon pressure.

kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
PART 1

I know that beams of light can push objects. Sunlight affects the spin of asteriods.

Therefore light can transfer angular momentum from one object to another on contact.

But I could not find the definition of such angular momentum! Where does it come from?

I did a little research, but all I could find is angular momentum and orbital angular momentum, but they are nothing like what I am thinking of.

PART 2

If light does not have mass, then it cannot contribute to the center of mass. People say the center of mass is the center of gravity. If photons do not change the center of gravity, then they cannot apply torque to a celestial object at a distance, right?

People say there are no "forces" in GR, which implies that there is no such thing as torque in GR, since that requires a force over an angle. If there is no such thing as torque in GR, then nothing in GR describes a transfer of angular momentum, which is by definition a torque. Then, it would imply that GR cannot predict local changes in angular momentum! If that's the case, if a photon were emitted and absorbed in a direction offset from the center of a mass, it would produce a torque, but it would have nothing to do with GR. If GR described gravitational waves resulting in an angular acceleration of some particles, then it must have something to do with forces. In a space with curvature, force and angular acceleration are inseperable. You cannot say that GR does not predict forces if you say that it explains the rotational acceleration of massive objects!

Is my judgement in PART 2 correct?
 
Science news on Phys.org
kmarinas86 said:
PART 1
I know that beams of light can push objects. Sunlight affects the spin of asteriods.
I don't think photon pressure does much to affect the spin of asteroids. It is more likely that it heats the surface and boils off volatiles creating thrust. This is actually more true of comets.
On a larger scale it is possible to use the photon pressure to create a solar sail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail

Therefore light can transfer angular momentum from one object to another on contact.
Light can transfer momentum, and if it hits a rotating object off-centre it will impart angular momentum.
Photons have a very small momentum given by P = h * frequency.
There is a device (whose name I have forgotten) with a black painted freely moving wheel in vacuum, it rotates from the photon pressure on the wheel panels

Sorry, I can't make any sense of part 2
 
Last edited:
I can't answer part 2, but here's a stab at part 1:

Don't forget that an object traveling in a straight line can have angular momentum too. You can't talk absolutely about "angular momentum", just "angular momentum about this particular point".

Let's pick the sun as the origin of our coordinate system. To keep things simple, let's assume an asteroid is falling into the sun, but it's far enough away so that it'd take a while. The sun shines photons of light outwards; relative to the sun, these photons have no angular momentum (classically speaking) because they're going straight outwards. When they hit the asteroid, the photons will bounce in various directions that aren't parallel to the sun, so they will gain angular momentum relative to the sun. The asteroid will gain angular momentum too, both about its axis, and about the sun, and when you sum up the angular momenta of the photons and the asteroid, you should get zero.

So to answer your question, the net angular momentum doesn't change, so it doesn't come from anywhere. The asteroid's angular momentum changes, but that's offset by the gain in angular momenta by the photons as they bounce off into a direction that's no longer parallel to the sun.
 
mgb_phys said:
There is a device (whose name I have forgotten) with a black painted freely moving wheel in vacuum, it rotates from the photon pressure on the wheel panels

The Crookes Radiometer. Crookes and Maxwell gave two different explanations of why it works, both of which were wrong.

Reynolds finally sorted it - and the cause isn't photon pressure at all.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/LightMill/light-mill.html
 
AlephZero said:
TCrookes and Maxwell gave two different explanations of why it works, both of which were wrong.
Reynolds finally sorted it - and the cause isn't photon pressure at all.
You're right I rembered that Crooke got it wrong but I thought he only got the direction wrong because the photons are 'reflected' with a longer wavelength and lower momentum.
I hadn't realized it was a purely aerodynamic effect.
 
kmarinas86 said:
PART 1

I know that beams of light can push objects. Sunlight affects the spin of asteriods.

Therefore light can transfer angular momentum from one object to another on contact.

The Yarkovsky effect explains the "sunlight-driven" movement of asteroids. But there is a part of the Yarkovsky effect you must consider. It's not the sunlight moving the asteroids directly. The sunlight heats them up and then the asteroids themselves emit infared radiation which moves them (ever so slowly - around 1000 miles in a billion years).

PART 2 is a notoriously tough one but not impossible so don't bail on GR :) - here's a link:

http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/LIGO_web/9902news/9902liv.html#Article_2

Here's a taste:

1.

"Specifically, we look at "null infinity"; the place and time far from all mass where gravity waves eventually reach. By looking here, one can obtain a definition that allows for the exchange of angular momentum through gravity wave emission."

2.

...by integrating over a sphere encompassing all the mass; this enables us to pick up the effects of the gravitational field because the integration samples globally rather than locally. The definition, thereby, becomes a non-local definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
16K