How do I analyze an audio amplifier circuit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing an audio amplifier circuit, focusing on aspects such as DC bias analysis, frequency response, and stability. Participants share their approaches to understanding the circuit's behavior and calculations related to various components.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about where to start with the DC bias analysis and questions the appropriateness of using an 8-ohm resistor as a load.
  • Another participant suggests that the circuit functions as a non-inverting amplifier with a gain close to one for DC voltage, providing specific current approximations for various components.
  • Several participants share simulation results that show varying current values for different parts of the circuit, indicating some agreement on the results but also highlighting discrepancies in understanding.
  • Discussions arise regarding the voltage drop across resistors and the assumptions made about the output voltage and transistor behavior, with some participants correcting each other's equations and interpretations.
  • One participant notes the frequency-dependent impedance of speakers, which could affect the analysis of the circuit.
  • There are ongoing clarifications about the relationships between various voltages and currents in the circuit, with some participants acknowledging mistakes in their calculations and assumptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share similar calculations and simulation results, but there are disagreements regarding specific interpretations of the circuit behavior and the relationships between voltages and currents. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on certain aspects.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on assumptions about the circuit's operation, such as the output voltage being zero or the behavior of specific transistors. There are also unresolved questions about the exact values of certain parameters, which could influence the analysis.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in audio amplifier design, circuit analysis, or those studying electronics may find the discussion relevant.

totota
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi. I'm trying to analyse an audio amplifier circuit (DC, frequency response, stability, etc.).

I began with the DC bias analysis but I'm having troubles finding where to start. I've attached the full circuit and a DC simplified version. I've placed an 8 ohm resistor as the load (8 ohm speaker), is this correct?

All I could come up with is (I'm assuming collector currents equal emitter currents):
##I_{C1}=V_{EB4} /R_6##
##I_{C2}=I_1-I_{C1}##
##V_{B4}=V_{CC}-V_{EB4}##

Should I start by doing the two-port equivalent of the feedback network (C3, R4, R5)? Somewhere else... ?
I'm pretty much lost.

Thank you in advance.

PS: I also found that ##I_{R17}=V_{BE9}/R_{17}## but that got me nowhere.
 

Attachments

  • SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE1-page-001.jpg
    SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE1-page-001.jpg
    26 KB · Views: 474
  • SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001.jpg
    SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 461
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Without going into nonlinear equations and numerical/iterative solution we are force to use to use a simplified solution based on some assumption.
Because this circuit is nothing more then a opamp based/style non-inverting amplifier with the gain of one (for DC voltage this circuit work just like voltage follower, but AC closed loop gain is Av ≈ 1+ R5/R4 ≈ 22V/V ).
So Vin = 0V this means that also is equal 0V ( we ignore Q1 and Q2 the base current).

Ic1 ≈ Ic2 ≈ I1/2 ≈ 1.18mA
Ic4 ≈ (Vcc - VbeQ6)/( R9 + R10) ≈ 5.2mA
Ic9 ≈ Ic4 - VbeQ9/R17 = 5.2mA - 0.38mA ≈ 4.82mA

The output stage current is undetermined because we do not know the exact value for a Vbe5 and Q6.

The simulation show as this result
Ic1 = 0.856mA
Ic2 = 1.51mA
Ic4 = 5.25mA
Ic9 = 4.81mA
Ic5 = 4.65mA
Ic6 = 3.8mA
Ic7 = 208mA
Ic8 = 209mA
 
First of all, thanks for replying!
Jony130 said:
The simulation show as this result
Ic1 = 0.856mA
Ic2 = 1.51mA
Ic4 = 5.25mA
Ic9 = 4.81mA
Ic5 = 4.65mA
Ic6 = 3.8mA
Ic7 = 208mA
Ic8 = 209mA
I've attached the results of the simulation that I ran.

Jony130 said:
Ic1 ≈ Ic2 ≈ I1/2 ≈ 1.18mA
For the differential amplifier I found the following (which more or less matches the simulation):
##I_{C1}=V_{EB4} /R_6=0.47 V/560 Ω=839.29 μA##
##I_{C2}=I_1-I_{C1}=1.54 mA##
##V_{B4}=V_{CC}-V_{EB4}=35 V-0.47 V=34.53 V##
##V_{B1}=-I_{C1}/β_{1}.(R_2+R_3)-V_{BE1}=-839.29 μA/325 . (22 kΩ+1 kΩ)-0.66 V=-0.72 V##
##V_{CE1}=V_{B4}-V_{B1}=34.53 V+0.72 V=35.25 V##
##V_{CE2}=V_{CC}-V_{B1}=35 V+0.72 V=35.72 V##

Jony130 said:
Ic9 ≈ Ic4 - VbeQ9/R17 = 5.2mA - 0.38mA ≈ 4.82mA
I understood this perfectly.

Jony130 said:
Ic4 ≈ (Vcc - VbeQ6)/( R9 + R10) ≈ 5.2mA
However I don't understand this equation. I get that ##I_{C4}=I_{R9}=I_{R10}## but I'm not seeing how the voltage drop across R10+R9 equals Vcc-Vbe6.
 

Attachments

  • SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001.jpg
    SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 478
  • SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE3-page-001.jpg
    SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE3-page-001.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 416
On the speaker front:

Speakers have frequency dependent impedances. They vary between about ½ the nominal (8Ω) to perhaps 5 times the nominal depending on the box they are in. (The box affects the power transfer depending on frequency.)
 
totota said:
but I'm not seeing how the voltage drop across R10+R9 equals Vcc-Vbe6.

Actually, it equals Vcc - Vr14 -Vbe6

If you assume the output voltage is 0V, then the voltage at the top of R9 is Vbe6+Vr14 below 0. But if you assume Ir14 == 0 then that means Vbe6 could be very low or zero.

On the other hand, If it is operating class A, then there is a drop across R14 even if Vrl == 0.
 
totota said:
I've attached the results of the simulation that I ran.
For the differential amplifier I found the following (which more or less matches the simulation):
##I_{C1}=V_{EB4} /R_6=0.47 V/560 Ω=839.29 μA##
##I_{C2}=I_1-I_{C1}=1.54 mA##
##V_{B4}=V_{CC}-V_{EB4}=35 V-0.47 V=34.53 V##
##V_{B1}=-I_{C1}/β_{1}.(R_2+R_3)-V_{BE1}=-839.29 μA/325 . (22 kΩ+1 kΩ)-0.66 V=-0.72 V##
##V_{CE1}=V_{B4}-V_{B1}=34.53 V+0.72 V=35.25 V##
##V_{CE2}=V_{CC}-V_{B1}=35 V+0.72 V=35.72 V##
Are you sure about VB1 ?? Notice that Q1 is a NPN transistor so the base current will flow into the Q1 base and this is why VB1 = Ib1*(R2 + R3) ≈ 60mV and VE1 = VB1 - Vbe1. Also to be more precise Ic1 is equal to Vbe4/R6 + IB4

totota said:
However I don't understand this equation. I get that ##I_{C4}=I_{R9}=I_{R10}## but I'm not seeing how the voltage drop across R10+R9 equals Vcc-Vbe6.
Notice that the voltage at Q6 emitter is equal to 0V (as we assumed) and if we ignore R14 voltage drop the voltage at Q6 base is Vbe6 below the 0V. So this means the voltage across r9 and R10 is Vcc - Vbe6.
 
Jeff Rosenbury said:
On the speaker front:

Speakers have frequency dependent impedances. They vary between about ½ the nominal (8Ω) to perhaps 5 times the nominal depending on the box they are in. (The box affects the power transfer depending on frequency.)
Thanks, will look into that.

meBigGuy said:
Actually, it equals Vcc - Vr14 -Vbe6

If you assume the output voltage is 0V, then the voltage at the top of R9 is Vbe6+Vr14 below 0. But if you assume Ir14 == 0 then that means Vbe6 could be very low or zero.

On the other hand, If it is operating class A, then there is a drop across R14 even if Vrl == 0.
Jony130 said:
Notice that the voltage at Q6 emitter is equal to 0V (as we assumed) and if we ignore R14 voltage drop the voltage at Q6 base is Vbe6 below the 0V. So this means the voltage across r9 and R10 is Vcc - Vbe6.
Now I got it, thanks!

Jony130 said:
Are you sure about VB1 ?? Notice that Q1 is a NPN transistor so the base current will flow into the Q1 base and this is why VB1 = Ib1*(R2 + R3) ≈ 60mV and VE1 = VB1 - Vbe1. Also to be more precise Ic1 is equal to Vbe4/R6 + IB4
You are right, I had some troubles with the sign of IB1; and it should be VE1 in my equation, not VB1.

##V_{E1}=I_{C1}/β_{1}.(R_2+R_3)-V_{BE1}=839.29 μA/325 . (22 kΩ+1 kΩ)-0.66 V=-0.60 V##In my last post I forgot to upload one simulation result (attached here).

Thanks everyone!
 

Attachments

  • SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001 (2).jpg
    SCHEMATIC1 _ PAGE2-page-001 (2).jpg
    30.3 KB · Views: 449
totota said:
You are right, I had some troubles with the sign of IB1; and it should be VE1 in my equation, not VB1.

##V_{E1}=I_{C1}/β_{1}.(R_2+R_3)-V_{BE1}=839.29 μA/325 . (22 kΩ+1 kΩ)-0.66 V=-0.60 V##
After reading your last post I notice that I also made a small mistake in finding VB1.
As I said earlier the base current enters into the Q1 base. So this means that the current will flow from GND through R2 and R1 and will flow into the base.
So the voltage at Q1 base must be negative VB1 = -Ib1*(R2 + R3) ≈ -60mV and Ve1 = VB1 - Vbe1 = -60mV - 0.61V = -0.67V
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
3K