- #1

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

Does anyone know a simple formula to calculate the acceleration of gravity underwater?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Charlie Kay
- Start date

In summary, the acceleration of gravity underwater is different from the standard gravity at sea level. This difference is due to the greater amount of drag present underwater.

- #1

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

Does anyone know a simple formula to calculate the acceleration of gravity underwater?

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

When m=body's mass, rhoA=fluid density, rhoB=body density, g=gravity, x=displacement, t=time, Cd=drag coefficient, V=body volume and A=body area

Help??!

- #3

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,811

- 1,672

What makes you think that the acceleration due to gravity is different underwater?Charlie Kay said:Does anyone know a simple formula to calculate the acceleration of gravity underwater?

- #4

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,811

- 1,672

And where did you get this formula?Charlie Kay said:

When m=body's mass, rhoA=fluid density, rhoB=body density, g=gravity, x=displacement, t=time, Cd=drag coefficient, V=body volume and A=body area

Help??!

- #5

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

a) there is more drag underwater and b)why, have you seen it before?

- #6

Vanadium 50

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Education Advisor

2023 Award

- 34,728

- 21,433

SteamKing said:What makes you think that the acceleration due to gravity is different underwater?

This. Ever see a movie set on a submarine? That's underwater, and the gravity looks normal.

- #7

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,544

- 2,323

Charlie Kay said:a) there is more drag underwater...

True but that's nothing to do with gravity.

I think your original question is wrong. I think what you are asking is.. What is the net vertical force (eg the sum of weight and buoyancy) ?

- #8

my2cts

- 362

- 26

Eureka !

- #9

Dale

Mentor

- 35,681

- 14,059

The acceleration due to gravity is g, by definition. That equation you have is the net force due to gravity + buoyancy + drag.Charlie Kay said:

When m=body's mass, rhoA=fluid density, rhoB=body density, g=gravity, x=displacement, t=time, Cd=drag coefficient, V=body volume and A=body area

Help??!

- #10

XZ923

- 136

- 63

- #11

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

The sea level is just a convenient reference level. You can be under the sea level but not underwater. Or way above the sea level and underwater.

It would be misleading to attribute the change in g due to altitude change to being (or not) "underwater".

- #12

Noctisdark

- 224

- 35

- #13

XZ923

- 136

- 63

nasu said:

The sea level is just a convenient reference level. You can be under the sea level but not underwater. Or way above the sea level and underwater.

It would be misleading to attribute the change in g due to altitude change to being (or not) "underwater".

Thanks that's pretty much what I figured. I knew that the presence of water wouldn't matter, I was just curious as to the sea level reference. I understand that it's simply the reference point that was chosen when they calculated the gravitational constant. I guess my question was more along the lines of "is the difference in gravitational force at the bottom of the Mariana's trench and the peak of Mt. Everest (because point A is closer to the center of the Earth's mass than point B; the water of course is irrelevant) significant enough to factor into calculations?

- #14

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

And also, on what is the accuracy of the other parameters entering the calculation.

- #15

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,811

- 1,672

XZ923 said:Thanks that's pretty much what I figured. I knew that the presence of water wouldn't matter, I was just curious as to the sea level reference. I understand that it's simply the reference point that was chosen when they calculated the gravitational constant. I guess my question was more along the lines of "is the difference in gravitational force at the bottom of the Mariana's trench and the peak of Mt. Everest (because point A is closer to the center of the Earth's mass than point B; the water of course is irrelevant) significant enough to factor into calculations?

This article has a discussion on the variation of g due to various factors, including altitude and latitude:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth

At the top of Mt. Everest for instance (approx. 9000 m above sea level), the value of g is about 0.29% lower than g measured at sea level. At the altitude the Space Shuttle formerly orbited, about 400 km above the surface, g was still about 90% of its value at sea level. There is a relatively simple formula to calculate g at altitude.

Going in the other direction, the variation of g with depth is a little trickier to calculate, because you must account for the mass of whatever solid (or liquid) material lies between the measurement depth and sea level. See more about this in the discussion of the Shell Theorem.

- #16

davenn

Science Advisor

Gold Member

2023 Award

- 9,630

- 10,639

XZ923 said:simply the reference point that was chosen when they calculated the gravitational constant

careful with your choice of words there

Gravitational Constant = G = approximately = 6.674×10

acceleration due to gravity ( eg at Earth's surface) = g = ~9.81 m/s

which is the one being discussed

Dave

- #17

XZ923

- 136

- 63

I stand corrected. Thank you sir. You're right, poor choice of words on my part. And SteamKing thanks for satisfying my curiosity!davenn said:careful with your choice of words there

Gravitational Constant = G = approximately = 6.674×10^{−11}N⋅m^{2}/kg^{2}a whole different thing

acceleration due to gravity ( eg at Earth's surface) = g = ~9.81 m/s^{2}

which is the one being discussed

Dave

- #18

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

When I said underwater I mean deep, as in 11,000 m below sea level!

- #19

- 27,623

- 19,150

Charlie Kay said:When I said underwater I mean deep, as in 11,000 m below sea level!

With ##M## as the mass of the Earth, ##R## the radius and assuming uniform density, the force of gravity a distance ##r## from the centre of the Earth, with ##r< R##, is given by:

##\frac{GMr}{R^3}##

It would be a good exercise to derive this equation for yourself.

- #20

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

This is pretty deep for diving or submarines.Charlie Kay said:When I said underwater I mean deep, as in 11,000 m below sea level!

But for change in gravity is not much. You compare 11 km with the radius of the Earth which is around 6,400 km. About 0.2%.

You should not expect a significant change. As g goes like r^2, the change in g may be some 0.4% or about 0.04 m/s^2.

- #21

- 27,623

- 19,150

nasu said:This is pretty deep for diving or submarines.

But for change in gravity is not much. You compare 11 km with the radius of the Earth which is around 6,400 km. About 0.2%.

You should not expect a significant change. As g goes like r^2, the change in g may be some 0.4% or about 0.04 m/s^2.

As above, ##g## actually changes linearly with ##r## inside a solid sphere.

- #22

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

There may be some corrections if we are looking at a deep narrow oceanic valley but I intended just an estimation of the effect that 11 km will have on g.

It also apply if you go up 11 km.

If you are going inside, the effect is smaller by a factor of 2, in first approximation. But I don't think is relevant here.

- #23

- 27,623

- 19,150

nasu said:

There may be some corrections if we are looking at a deep narrow oceanic valley but I intended just an estimation of the effect that 11 km will have on g.

It also apply if you go up 11 km.

If you are going inside, the effect is smaller by a factor of 2, in first approximation. But I don't think is relevant here.

The Earth is solid, in the sense that it's not hollow. In any case, outside the surface gravity varies as ##1/r^2##, but inside the Earth gravity varies as ##r##. That's the critical point.

- #24

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

One more time, I was not talking about what happens inside the Earth.

And I don't contest the (1/r) r dependence inside a solid, homogeneous, perfectly spherical Earth.

However, if you want to estimate the effect of going on the bottom of the ocean, a large, shallow deep in the crust rather than a narrow pith, I don't think that the 1/r applies.

There is no solid material above you. The 1/r^2 is also not exactly true. The dependence is more complicated. But it was just an order of magnitude estimate.

The difference between (1/r) r and 1/r^2 is less than an order of magnitude for that small difference so it does not even matter.

If you want to be very accurate, the (1/r) r does not even work for the real Earth, at that depth. g increases as you go down in the crust, for at least 11 km.

On the average, of course.

Edit. Corrected error (replaced 1/r by r) after observed by Perok.

And I don't contest the (1/r) r dependence inside a solid, homogeneous, perfectly spherical Earth.

However, if you want to estimate the effect of going on the bottom of the ocean, a large, shallow deep in the crust rather than a narrow pith, I don't think that the 1/r applies.

There is no solid material above you. The 1/r^2 is also not exactly true. The dependence is more complicated. But it was just an order of magnitude estimate.

The difference between (1/r) r and 1/r^2 is less than an order of magnitude for that small difference so it does not even matter.

If you want to be very accurate, the (1/r) r does not even work for the real Earth, at that depth. g increases as you go down in the crust, for at least 11 km.

On the average, of course.

Edit. Corrected error (replaced 1/r by r) after observed by Perok.

Last edited:

- #25

- 27,623

- 19,150

nasu said:One more time, I was not talking about what happens inside the Earth.

And I don't contest the 1/r dependence inside a solid, homogeneous, perfectly spherical Earth.

However, if you want to estimate the effect of going on the bottom of the ocean, a large, shallow deep in the crust rather than a narrow pith, I don't think that the 1/r applies.

There is no solid material above you. The 1/r^2 is also not exactly true. The dependence is more complicated. But it was just an order of magnitude estimate.

The difference between 1/r and 1/r^2 is less than an order of magnitude for that small difference so it does not even matter.

If you want to be very accurate, the 1/r does not even work for the real Earth, at that depth. g increases as you go down in the crust, for at least 11 km.

On the average, of course.

Okay. But, it's not ##1/r## inside a sphere. It's ##r##.

I'd be interested in the calculations that show that ##g## increases as you go down into the crust. How far do you have to go down before gravity does indeed begin to decrease?

- #26

nasu

Homework Helper

- 4,438

- 893

Thank you for the correction.

You can start with Wikipedia.

It's not a theoretical calculation but rather models based on actual measurements. Or calculations based on models of the Earth's structure (based on actual seismic measurements and maybe other things I don't know about)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_of_Earth

- #27

- #28

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

someone told me that the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81

I can now calculate underwater pressure, see my other forum

- #29

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,811

- 1,672

Charlie Kay said:Guys, i think I've got it!

someone told me that the acceleration due to gravity = 9.81

It's important to know the units as well.

g = 9.81 m/s

- #30

Charlie Kay

- 14

- 0

which stands for?

- #31

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,811

- 1,672

m/sCharlie Kay said:which stands for?

in imperial units, g = 32.2 ft/s

The acceleration of gravity, denoted as *g*, is the same underwater as it is on land. It is a constant value of 9.8 meters per second squared (m/s^{2}) regardless of the medium.

The formula for calculating the acceleration of gravity underwater is the same as on land: *g = F/m*, where *F* is the force of gravity and *m* is the mass of the object. However, in water, the value for *m* may change due to buoyancy.

No, the depth of the water does not affect the acceleration of gravity. As long as the object is submerged in water, the acceleration of gravity remains constant at 9.8 m/s^{2}.

The density of water does not directly affect the acceleration of gravity. However, it can affect the buoyancy of an object, which in turn can affect the value of *m* in the acceleration of gravity formula.

Yes, the same formula can be used to calculate the acceleration of gravity in any body of water, as long as the object is fully submerged. However, the value for *m* may vary depending on the density of the water.

- Replies
- 19

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 4K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 5K

- Replies
- 51

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 917

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 805

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 3K

Share: