How do I calculate the friction coefficient for my pendulum using Excel?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tinkeringone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the friction coefficient (μβ) for a pendulum using Excel, specifically addressing the formula μβ = ln(1+Z) − ln(1−Z) where Z = Δθ(L/d). The user initially encountered issues with negative logarithms due to incorrect angle units, as Δθ must be in radians for the calculations to yield valid results. The correct conversion from degrees to radians (Δθ = 0.50° = 0.0087 rad) allows Z to be recalculated as 0.48, ensuring that both logarithmic arguments are positive. The conversation highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Excel functions and formulas
  • Knowledge of angular measurements in both degrees and radians
  • Basic principles of pendulum mechanics and friction coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to convert degrees to radians in Excel
  • Explore the Analysis Toolpak add-in for handling complex numbers in Excel
  • Research the physical significance of friction coefficients in pendulum systems
  • Study the small angle approximation and its applications in pendulum motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, hobbyists building pendulum systems, and anyone interested in calculating friction coefficients in mechanical systems.

tinkeringone
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Not sure, but apparently somebody threw some LOGS in my pendulum. HELP!

Trying to create a spreadsheet for calculating the friction coefficients in the pendulums I've been making. Here's the problem I just can't figure out.

μβ = ln (1+Z) − ln (1−Z)

where
Z = Δθ(L/d)
Δθ = 0.50 degrees
L = 1 meter
d = 18 mm, i.e. .018 meters
Z = 27.7777

I'm thinking that I already know that μβ = .34, but I can't figure out how to get Excel to calculate that right side of the formula, i.e. "ln (1−Z)", because 1-Z creates a negative value. So it's like you have to create some kind of imaginary number or something like Euler's?

Can anybody tell me how I can get Excel to calculate this, so I can enter my other pendulums into it?

Thanks,
Tinkeringone
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EDIT: Ignore this post. See Bob S's explanation in Post #3.

The ln of a negative number is a complex number,

ln(x) = ln(|x|) + iπ , . . x < 0


(There is an ambiguity though, since you are free to add or subtract multiples of 2iπ to this result.)

However, I'm not aware of anything physically meaningful about a complex friction coefficient. You might want to check your equations or parameter values to see if there is an error somewhere that leads to taking the log of a negative value.

That being said, you have two choices for getting Excel to handle complex numbers. Either use two cells to store the value (1 cell each for the real and imaginary parts), or you can install the Analysis Toolpack add-in which will allow Excel to handle complex numbers.
 
Last edited:
I would like to know the source for your equations μβ and Z. The log arguments 1+Z and 1-Z have to be unitless. For this reason, the angle delta θ has to be in radians, not degrees.
Bob S
 
Bob, excellent point. If we use Δθ in radians, we get

Δθ = 0.50° = 0.0087 rad

Z = Δθ L/d = 0.0087*1/0.018 = 0.48 < 1

In that case, the log arguments are positive and there is no issue.
 
Bob – here’s the source of my information you requested. It’s a very interesting source. He’s loading up a simple pendulum with lots of mechanical friction to the point where the friction losses overwhelm the air drag losses, making it easier to calculate the friction loss coefficient.
It loses .5 degrees per half period, i.e. 1 degree per period from 30 degrees down to about 10 degrees. I think that the friction coefficient is the combined amount for the aluminum wire and the groove in the stationary 18 mm rod the wire pivots on. And I think that the combined friction coefficient he shows is .34.
The 27.7777 value I posted for Z was a value I came up with by trial and error.
The rest are based on data from the source.
The equation I initially posted was number (11 & 12) in the link. That is obviously a rearranged version of number (10) before those for the purpose of determining the friction coefficient rather than the loss in degrees per cycle.

Here’s the link:

http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/uploads/docs/290147.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi-
Looking at Eq 4 and 5 in your link, it is apparent that theta is in radians, not degrees (the small angle approx for cos(theta)). The pendulum in the link looks like a compound pendulum. Check the design before you build it.
Bob S
 
Bob S said:
Hi-
Looking at Eq 4 and 5 in your link, it is apparent that theta is in radians, not degrees (the small angle approx for cos(theta)).
Also, using radians exactly reproduces the results shown in Table 2, using their parameters:
L = 1 m
d = 18 mm
β = π
The pendulum in the link looks like a compound pendulum. Check the design before you build it.
Bob S
Looking at Fig. 3, it appears that the system behaves as a simple pendulum. Apparently the lower wire is stiff enough for this to be the case.

Bob – here’s the source of my information you requested. It’s a very interesting source. He’s loading up a simple pendulum with lots of mechanical friction to the point where the friction losses overwhelm the air drag losses, making it easier to calculate the friction loss coefficient.
.
.
.
http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/uploads/docs/290147.pdf
Interesting article, thanks for sharing!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K