How do I choose which professor to mention in my grad school SOP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bluechic92
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of writing a statement of purpose (SOP) for grad school applications, particularly regarding which professors to mention. The individual is torn between highlighting a professor they know well from a course and another whose research aligns closely with their interests in high-energy physics (HEP) theory. They express concern about the limited word count and the implications of mentioning multiple professors in a small department. Ultimately, they receive advice to focus on the future goals of their research rather than overemphasizing past connections. The individual concludes by submitting their application, indicating a resolution to their earlier confusion.
bluechic92
Messages
175
Reaction score
15
This might be silly, but I have exhausted my brain by thinking too much about this.

I've been taking a grad course at a University to which I am applying for Grad school. I did fairly well in this course and the prof of the course knows me very well and knows my research interests. I didn't really talk to him about applying THERE for grad school because i felt awkward. However, we've had discussions about grad school and related in general.

I know it was pretty dumb of me to not talk about attending grad there with him, but now it is a bit too late. It is winter break and the deadline for that school is sort of on the horizon.

The SOP for this school requires that we only have 1000 words. After discussing my research background and etc. I decided that I can discuss 3 profs. I included two profs that strongly match the work I've done in undergrad/interests and now I really have room for ONE more. I'm feeling rather conflicted. There is another prof. who has done work in my field of interest (HEP Theory) and now is sort of moving towards Cosmology. The prof I took a class with (will continue this class spring sem.) does extensive work in Cosmology. I wish I had room to discuss both and I am sure I can tweak my application to do that, but at the same time ... this department is small and I if I do that then I might as well mention ALL the profs.

Should I mention the prof. I did class with because he knows me well and my capabilities (class/research)? Or should I mention the other prof. because he does more work on my field of interest in HEP theory even tho he is also moving towards Cosmology? This is too confusing and I think I am just thinking too much.

One more question! I never thought about putting the profs in order of preference when I write my SOP ...but I rather place them so that my statement flows logically. It is true that the first prof. I mention is the one I would like to work with the most, but after that I mention the rest so that it flows. Are you supposed to mention them in order or pref?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You're overthinking this.

2. A SOP is supposed to be predominantly a statement of purpose - i.e. a statement looking forward, not a statement about the past. They have your packet. They know what you've done. They want to know what you want to do.
 
You are right! Thanks you for that. Happy New Years! I submitted my app as well =)
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top