How Do I Correctly Calculate Volume for a UVZ Coordinate System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating volume within a UVZ coordinate system, specifically addressing integration limits and variable transformations in relation to a geometric region defined by certain boundaries.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of terms like "cotant" and question the limits of integration for variables u and v. There are attempts to clarify the geometric representation of the volume in question and the relationship between the UVZ and XYZ coordinate systems.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered suggestions for alternative approaches, such as considering the problem in traditional XYZ coordinates before attempting variable changes. There is an ongoing exploration of the geometric setup and integration limits, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the representation of the volume and the specific coordinate system being used. There is also mention of a sketch that illustrates the region of integration, which may not align with all participants' interpretations.

sedaw
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
attached herewith : the problem with my attempt to solve it .
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
1. What is "an" in "cot ant"?

2. How did you get the limits of integration? Specifically, what are the limits of integration on u and v?
 
HallsofIvy said:
1. What is "an" in "cot ant"?

2. How did you get the limits of integration? Specifically, what are the limits of integration on u and v?

cotan(t) = cos(t)/sit(t)

the limits of integration on u & v simply received from the projection of the region bounded by V on the UV plane -> you can see it circle with radius R=1 .

the limits of integration on z:

you can see in sketch : 0<=z<=U+V (of course just for u & v that in region of the projection )
TNX ...
 
Yeah, the ant thing . . . not a good way to start sedaw. Did you just enter "cotant" in latex and it partitioned it that way? Just use \cot. But even worst, that picture looks nothing like what I think your V is. Guess the J is Jacobian. But I wouldn't try to change variables until I first tried to solve it the old-fashioned way: just use x, y, and z. Oh, but I would also try to plot a real-looking picture first. Is the volume that part under the paraboloid z=x^2+y^2[/tex] contained by the transparent &quot;square-tube&quot; of x^4+y^4=1 under the paraboloid in the plot below?<br /> <br /> If so, can you see how to arrive at:<br /> <br /> V=8\int_0^{1/2^{1/4}}\int_x^{\sqrt[4]{1-x^4}}\left(x^2+y^2\right) dydx<br /> <br /> That comes out to about 2.22. Would be nice if you already know the answer to see at least if this is on the right track and I realize that&#039;s a tough integral to solve symbolically, but it get&#039;s you grounded at least with something concrete to work with and then perhaps you can use that integral to then change variables. Maybe not though. It&#039;s just a suggestion.
 

Attachments

  • myvol1.jpg
    myvol1.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 437
Last edited:
ok.. thank you very much i am appreciate your help.
by the way my picture is V for the uvz axis and not xyz .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K