How Do I Evaluate This Surface Integral on a Paraboloid?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the surface integral of the function G(x, y, z) = 1/(1 + 4(x^2 + y^2)) over the paraboloid defined by z = x^2 + y^2, from z = 0 to z = 1. The user initially rewrote G as 1/(1 + 4z) and sought clarification on the correct differential elements for integration. Key insights include the recommendation to use polar coordinates for simplification, leading to the integral ∫∫_R (r/√(4r² + 1)) dθ dr, which is straightforward to evaluate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals and their applications
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates in multiple integration
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, specifically gradient and cross product
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of polar coordinates in surface integrals
  • Learn about the gradient and divergence in vector calculus
  • Explore the concept of differential area elements in various coordinate systems
  • Practice evaluating surface integrals with different functions and surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and vector analysis, as well as anyone involved in computational geometry or physics requiring surface integral evaluations.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
The Problem
Evaluate the surface integral of

[tex] G(x, y, z) = \frac{1}{1 + 4(x^2+y^2)}[/tex]

where [itex]z[/itex] is the paraboloid defined by

[tex] z = x^2 + y^2[/tex],

from [itex]z = 0[/itex] to [itex]z = 1[/itex].
My Work

I rewrote [itex]G(x, y, z)[/itex] as

[tex]\frac{1}{1+4z}[/tex].

Then, I evaluated the surface integral (I'm skipping a few steps in the evaluation here):

[tex] \int \!\!\! \int_R \frac{1}{1+4z} \sqrt{1+4z} \,dA = \int \!\!\! \int_R \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+4z}}[/tex].

My Confusion
I do not understand how to evaluate this integral properly. I am not experienced in multiple integration, but I have not found an issue with it until now.

Basically, what are my differential elements supposed to be ([itex]dx, dy[/itex]?). Am I supposed to use polar coordinates here?

If someone could put me on the correct track, I would appreciate it. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You dropped "dA" from the last integral. One of the things you need to decide is how to write the differential of surface area- thre are several different ways to do that. In particular, you need to decide whether you will project onto the xy-plane, the yz-plane, the xz-plane, or use parametric equations for the surface. I can't possibly decide whether you are "supposed" to use polar coordinates- but it might be a good idea to use them!

Projecting to xy-plane: The way I like to do it is use the gradient of the equation of the surface. Since [itex]z= x^2+ y^2[/itex], [itex]x^2+ y^2- z= 0[/itex] and we can think of that as a "level surface" of [itex]F(x,y,z)= x^2+ y^2- z[/itex]. The divergence of that, 2xi+ 2yj- k, is perpendicular to the surface at each point. We can "normalize" to the xy-plane by multiplying by -1 (so that the k component is 1): (-2xi- 2yi+ k)dxdy is the vector 'differential of surface area' and its length [itex]\sqrt{4x^2+ 4y^2+ 1}dxdy[/itex] is the diffrential of surface area. Of course it doesn't help to write integrand in terms of z now. When z= 1, [itex]x^2+ y^2= 1[/itex] and that projects down to the xy-plane as the unit circle. The integral is
[tex]\int_{x= -1}^1\int_{y= -\sqrt{1-x^2}}^\sqrt{1- x^2} \frac{\sqrt{4x^2+ 4y^2+1}}{1+ 4x^2+ 4y^2}dxdy[/tex]
which is easy. You can, of course, convert that to polar coordinates if you want to.

Since, as you point out, the integrand can be written as a function of z only, it might make sense to project to the xz-plane. Again we can use the grad F= 2xi+ 2yj- k. We "normalize" to the xz-plane by dividing by 2y (to make the j component 1): [itex]\frac{x}{y}i+ j- \frax{1}{2y}k dxdz[/itex] is the vector differential and its length is [itex]\sqrt{\frac{x^2}{y^2}+ 1+ \frac{1}{4y^2}}dxdz= \frac{\sqrt{x^2+ y^2+ 1}}{2y} dxdz[/tex]<br /> Hmm, that looks more complicated so let's drop that!<br /> <br /> Because of the circular symmetry of the parabola, it would make sense to use polar coordinates to get parametric equations for it: let [itex]x= r cos(\theta)[/itex], [itex]y= r sin(\theta)[/itex], and [itex]z= x^2+ y^2= r^2[/itex]. The "position vector" of any point on the parabola is<br /> [itex]v= r cos(\theta)i+ r sin(\theta)j+ r^2 k[/itex]. Differentiate with respect to the two parameters: [itex]v_r= cos(\theta)i+ sin(\theta)j+ 2rk[/itex] and [itex]v_\theta= -rsin(\theta)i+ rcos(\theta)j[/itex].<br /> The "fundamental vector product" for this surface is the cross product of the two: [itex]-2r^2 cos(\theta)i- 2r^2 sin(\theta)j+ r k[/itex]. The length of that is [itex]r\sqrt{4r^2+ 1}[/itex] and so the differential of surface area in terms of r and [itex]\theta[/itex] is [itex]r\sqrt{4r^2+1}drd\theta[/itex]. The integral is <br /> [tex]\int_{r= 0}^1\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi}\frac{r}{\sqrt{4r^2+1}}d\theta dr[/tex]<br /> which is easy to integrate.[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the explanation!

I am posting this for my own convenience - the LaTeX source was invalid:
[tex]\int_{r= 0}^1\int_{\theta= 0}^{2\pi}\frac{r}{\sqrt{4r^2+1}} \,d\theta \,dr[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K