MHB How do I find the angles in a triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To find the angles in a triangle, it's essential to know that the sum of all angles equals 180 degrees. For a triangle with two angles of 122 degrees, the third angle can be calculated as 64 degrees. In another triangle with a right angle and a 37-degree angle, the third angle is found to be 53 degrees. For an isosceles triangle with base angles of 63 degrees, the third angle is calculated as 54 degrees. Finally, using these angles, the value of x in a straight line equation can be determined as 73 degrees.
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to work out how I'd calculate the values in the below. Rather than just have the answer, I'd really like to understand how I'd calculate this. Thank you in advance!

View attachment 9127
 

Attachments

  • TRIG Q.jpg
    TRIG Q.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 135
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the first question, you need to know two things.
1. A straight lines forms an angle of 180 degrees
2. All angles in a triangle must add up to 180 degrees.

Use the first principle to solve for the two interior angles of the triangle other than x. It would look like this:
180 degrees = 122 degrees + interior angle
interior angle = 180 degrees - 122 degrees = 58 degrees.

The calculation is the same for both angles, since they are both 122 degrees.
View attachment 9131
Now you have a triangle with interior angles 58 degrees, 58 degrees, and x.
Use the second principle (all angles in a triangle add up to 180) to solve for x.

x + 58 degrees + 58 degrees = 180 degrees
x = 180 - 58 degrees - 58 degrees
x= 64 degrees.

For the second question, you need to know the two things above, plus the fact that
3. Isosceles triangles have two sides that are the same length, and therefore two angles that are the same measure. Those angles are the base angles.

Start by looking at the triangle furthest to the right. You are given that the triangle has one right angle, and one angle that is 37 degrees. Using the fact that all angles add up to 180 degrees, solve for the third angle.
Third angle + 37 degrees + 90 degrees = 180 degrees
Third angle = 180 degrees - 37 degrees - 90 degrees.
Third angle = 53 degrees.
View attachment 9128
Now, move on to the second triangle. Use the fact that this triangle is isosceles, and therefor its base angles are the same. This means that the other base angle also has a measure of 63 degrees.
View attachment 9129
Now, we know two angles of the second triangle, and can solve for the third using the same method as above.
Third angle + 63 degrees + 63 degrees = 180 degrees.
Third angle = 180 degrees - 63 degrees - 63 degrees
Third angle = 54 degrees
View attachment 9130
Now you can use the fact that a straight line forms an angle of 180 degrees to solve for x.
x + 54 degrees + 53 degrees = 180 degrees
x = 180 degrees - 54 degrees - 53 degrees
x = 73 degrees
 

Attachments

  • question2-1.PNG
    question2-1.PNG
    11 KB · Views: 105
  • question2-2.PNG
    question2-2.PNG
    11.4 KB · Views: 111
  • question2-3.PNG
    question2-3.PNG
    12.8 KB · Views: 129
  • question1-1.PNG
    question1-1.PNG
    7.7 KB · Views: 124
Thank you so much Catmitt98 for the detailed response. This makes complete sense. :):):)

Thanks again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top