MHB How do I find the angles in a triangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gazparkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To find the angles in a triangle, it's essential to know that the sum of all angles equals 180 degrees. For a triangle with two angles of 122 degrees, the third angle can be calculated as 64 degrees. In another triangle with a right angle and a 37-degree angle, the third angle is found to be 53 degrees. For an isosceles triangle with base angles of 63 degrees, the third angle is calculated as 54 degrees. Finally, using these angles, the value of x in a straight line equation can be determined as 73 degrees.
gazparkin
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to work out how I'd calculate the values in the below. Rather than just have the answer, I'd really like to understand how I'd calculate this. Thank you in advance!

View attachment 9127
 

Attachments

  • TRIG Q.jpg
    TRIG Q.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 137
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the first question, you need to know two things.
1. A straight lines forms an angle of 180 degrees
2. All angles in a triangle must add up to 180 degrees.

Use the first principle to solve for the two interior angles of the triangle other than x. It would look like this:
180 degrees = 122 degrees + interior angle
interior angle = 180 degrees - 122 degrees = 58 degrees.

The calculation is the same for both angles, since they are both 122 degrees.
View attachment 9131
Now you have a triangle with interior angles 58 degrees, 58 degrees, and x.
Use the second principle (all angles in a triangle add up to 180) to solve for x.

x + 58 degrees + 58 degrees = 180 degrees
x = 180 - 58 degrees - 58 degrees
x= 64 degrees.

For the second question, you need to know the two things above, plus the fact that
3. Isosceles triangles have two sides that are the same length, and therefore two angles that are the same measure. Those angles are the base angles.

Start by looking at the triangle furthest to the right. You are given that the triangle has one right angle, and one angle that is 37 degrees. Using the fact that all angles add up to 180 degrees, solve for the third angle.
Third angle + 37 degrees + 90 degrees = 180 degrees
Third angle = 180 degrees - 37 degrees - 90 degrees.
Third angle = 53 degrees.
View attachment 9128
Now, move on to the second triangle. Use the fact that this triangle is isosceles, and therefor its base angles are the same. This means that the other base angle also has a measure of 63 degrees.
View attachment 9129
Now, we know two angles of the second triangle, and can solve for the third using the same method as above.
Third angle + 63 degrees + 63 degrees = 180 degrees.
Third angle = 180 degrees - 63 degrees - 63 degrees
Third angle = 54 degrees
View attachment 9130
Now you can use the fact that a straight line forms an angle of 180 degrees to solve for x.
x + 54 degrees + 53 degrees = 180 degrees
x = 180 degrees - 54 degrees - 53 degrees
x = 73 degrees
 

Attachments

  • question2-1.PNG
    question2-1.PNG
    11 KB · Views: 108
  • question2-2.PNG
    question2-2.PNG
    11.4 KB · Views: 116
  • question2-3.PNG
    question2-3.PNG
    12.8 KB · Views: 130
  • question1-1.PNG
    question1-1.PNG
    7.7 KB · Views: 128
Thank you so much Catmitt98 for the detailed response. This makes complete sense. :):):)

Thanks again!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top