MHB How do I get the book's answer for finding the area of a gable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
To find the area of a gable defined by right-triangle trigonometry, the height (h) is calculated using h = 43*sin(39.4°), resulting in 27.3 feet. The half base (b) is determined as b = 43*cos(39.4°), which equals 33.2 feet. The area is then computed using the formula A = (1/2)(base)(height), yielding 906.4 square feet. However, the book's answer is 906.9 square feet, suggesting a different calculation method involving the sine of an angle. Clarification is needed on the terminology used, specifically replacing "radius" with "half the base."
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Good morning everyone. I'm working on some right-triangle trigonometry problems in the Cohen textbook as I wait to receive my Sullivan precalculus book. It should arrive next week.

Suppose that theta = 39.4° and x = 43.0 feet. Find h and round answer to one decimal place.

I found h to be 27.3 feet.

The gable is the triangular region bounded by the rafters and the attic floor. Find the area of the gable. Round the final answer to one decimal place.

Before calculating the area, I needed to find the radius, which turns out to be 33.2 feet.

I then used A = (1/2)(base)(height).
My answer is 906.4 ft^2.
The book's answer is 906.9 ft^2.
How do I get the book's answer?

20200731_105122.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't use the word "radius" since there is no circle. I presume you mean half the base of the gable. Yes, the height is the "opposite side" of a right triangle with angle 39.4 degrees and hypotenuse 43 feet. h= 43*sin(39.4)= 27.3 feet rounded to one decimal place. One half the base is b= 43*cos(39.4)= 33.2 feet.

The area of the gable is (27.3)(33.2)= 906.4 square feet, not 906.7
 
$A = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot 43^2 \cdot \sin[180 - 2(39.4)] \approx 906.9 \, ft^2$
 
Country Boy said:
I wouldn't use the word "radius" since there is no circle. I presume you mean half the base of the gable. Yes, the height is the "opposite side" of a right triangle with angle 39.4 degrees and hypotenuse 43 feet. h= 43*sin(39.4)= 27.3 feet rounded to one decimal place. One half the base is b= 43*cos(39.4)= 33.2 feet.

The area of the gable is (27.3)(33.2)= 906.4 square feet, not 906.7

Thank you very much. Yes, I meant to say half the base of the gable not radius. Please, read my next thread in the Chat Room and reply.
 
skeeter said:
$A = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot 43^2 \cdot \sin[180 - 2(39.4)] \approx 906.9 \, ft^2$

Simply put. Please, read my next thread in the Chat Room and reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top