I How do I rearrange this equation and make x the subject

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter John Connor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rearrange
AI Thread Summary
Rearranging the equation k/((j+x)*^(1/2-a))+1=r/(x-1) to isolate x is challenging. If "*^" indicates exponentiation, finding an exact solution for x is generally impossible, though approximations may be feasible in certain scenarios. If it denotes multiplication, isolating x becomes more achievable. The complexity of the equation significantly impacts the ability to solve for x. Ultimately, the feasibility of rearranging the equation depends on the interpretation of the notation used.
John Connor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
equation is:

k/((j+x)*^(1/2-a))+1=r/(x-1)

Been spending countless hours on trying to figure a way to make x the subject in the equation and haven't got anywhere.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why do you think, it's possible? And what is your goal?
 
Is it possible? I want to rearrange the equation so the x is by itself.
 
John Connor said:
Is it possible?
No.
 
What is "*^"? If it is exponentiation or a combination of complex conjugation and exponentiation, it is impossible (but it could be possible to get approximations in some cases). If it is multiplication, it is possible.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Fermat's Last Theorem'

Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Can this be rearranged to solve?
Replies
5
Views
983
MHB Rearranging Formulas: Finding W in Terms of M and L
Replies
5
Views
1K
MHB Rearranging simple equation by making x the subject: 205 = ((4*pi*x*f)/c)^2
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Rearranging Formula, making x the subject from y=5(x+3)
Replies
12
Views
3K
MHB Make x the subject of 2x/5-3b/4=x+5
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Partial Differential Equation solved using Products
Replies
2
Views
2K
B To calculate the polar unit vectors using rotated coordinates
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Solve for 'W': Equation Rearranger Online Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Rearrange equation (solution of ODE)
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB Rearranging the subject of an equation help please
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top